SStatWharf

Best PR Analytics Tools (2026): Top 9 Compared

Updated September 2026By StatWharf Editorial9 vendorsMethodology

Compare buyer fit, pricing notes and trade-offs. How entries are ordered.

Compare at a glance

Select a vendor for details and sources. Scroll the table horizontally on smaller screens.

PR Analytics Tools: vendor fit and recorded pricing
VendorConsider forPricing notes
OnclusiveenterpriseEnterprise comms teams that need coverage tied to business outcomesCore platform quote-based; GEO Analytics AI-visibility module from $105/mo (checked Sep 2026)
CisionenterpriseLarge communications teams benchmarking share of voice against named competitorsQuote-based (checked Sep 2026)
MeltwaterenterpriseTeams that need a dedicated PR reporting product inside a wider media suiteQuote-based (checked Sep 2026)
Muck Rackmid-marketPR teams that want measurement built into the same tool used for pitchingQuote-based (checked Sep 2026)
Propel AI (formerly Propel PRM)specialistSmall PR teams wanting attribution and productivity metrics from a CRM built for PRQuote-based (checked Sep 2026)
Agility PR Solutionsmid-marketMid-market teams that want ROI dashboards bundled with monitoring and a media databaseQuote-based (checked Sep 2026)
Prowly (Semrush AI PR Toolkit)smbSmall teams inside the Semrush ecosystem wanting AI-cited media discovery with basic attributionBase $149/mo, Pro $279/mo, billed annually (checked Sep 2026)
CoverageBooksmbPublicists and agencies that need a fast, client-ready coverage reportBronze $99/mo, Bronze Plus $169/mo, Silver $229/mo, Gold $599/mo, excl. VAT (checked Sep 2026)
MemospecialistLarge brands wanting verified readership data instead of modeled impressionsQuote-based (checked Sep 2026)

These comparisons draw on public product information, not hands-on testing of every tool. Source records identify available references and checks; missing evidence is marked. Buyer fit is an editorial assessment, not a measured performance score. How to use this research.

PR analytics tools measure what a communications programme achieved rather than what it merely produced. Where a media monitoring feed answers what was said and where, these tools convert that coverage into share of voice against named competitors, message pull-through, outlet quality and sentiment trend, and, in a smaller number of cases, a link between coverage and referral traffic, branded search or revenue. The output is usually a dashboard or report built for a communications leader or a chief executive rather than an analyst working the data day to day.

The market splits into four groups. Enterprise suites, including Onclusive, Cision and Meltwater, sell attribution, AI-visibility tracking and executive dashboards on quoted annual contracts. PR-specific platforms such as Muck Rack and Agility PR Solutions bundle measurement with a media database and monitoring under a single, largely quoted, subscription. Lighter, published-price tools, Prowly, CoverageBook and Propel PRM, package reporting or attribution into a fixed fee aimed at smaller teams. Memo occupies its own niche, licensing verified readership data from publishers. Compare documented fit, source status and trade-offs before shortlisting.

Vendor details and trade-offs

Onclusive

enterprise
Consider forEnterprise comms teams that need coverage tied to business outcomes
Pricing notesCore platform quote-based; GEO Analytics AI-visibility module from $105/mo (checked Sep 2026)
Product referenceonclusive.com
Feature to evaluatePR Attribution and Power of Voice metrics that connect coverage to revenue and content quality

Onclusive is a communications intelligence and PR measurement platform operated by Onclusive, a company formed through the merger of several earned-media analytics vendors including AirPR and Kantar Media's PR software business. The platform is built around a proprietary global newscrawler analyzing millions of pieces of earned, owned and social content daily across more than 100 languages, and around two metrics the company credits itself with inventing: PR Attribution, which links published content to business outcomes including revenue, and Power of Voice, a content-quality score combining outlet relevance, authority, social amplification and article tone into one real-time figure.

Beyond those two flagship metrics, the platform provides custom dashboards, alerting, reusable report templates and a self-service monitoring layer, Onclusive 360, sitting underneath the full Enterprise application. A separate GEO Analytics product tracks how a brand appears inside AI-generated answers across ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Claude and Grok, reporting prompts, share of voice and positioning, and is sold on its own published annual plans starting from $105 per month for one country and 80 prompts.

Neither the Unified Platform nor Onclusive 360 publishes pricing; both require booking a demo, with cost described on-site as flexible and scaled to coverage breadth, user count and whether monitoring is self-service or fully managed. Only GEO Analytics, the newer AI-visibility module, carries a fixed published entry price, with higher tiers adding countries, additional AI platforms and a larger monthly prompt allowance. Onclusive suits a communications function that wants proprietary attribution and content-quality scoring and is comfortable working through a sales process to get it. It is a weaker fit for a team that wants a self-service monthly price before any conversation, since the core measurement platform, unlike GEO Analytics, remains quote-only.

Potential strengths

  • Two proprietary measurement metrics, PR Attribution and Power of Voice, tie coverage directly to business outcomes and content quality
  • The GEO Analytics AI-visibility module publishes fixed monthly pricing from $105, unusual for this category
  • AI visibility tracking extends share-of-voice measurement across five major AI search platforms

Trade-offs

  • The core measurement platform, including PR Attribution and Power of Voice, is entirely quote-based and requires a demo before any price is shared
  • Self-service monitoring (Onclusive 360) also requires booking a demo rather than a self-serve signup
Sources and status

Cision

enterprise
Consider forLarge communications teams benchmarking share of voice against named competitors
Pricing notesQuote-based (checked Sep 2026)
Product referencecision.com
Feature to evaluateCisionOne AI Visibility Dashboard extends share-of-voice benchmarking into AI-generated answers

Cision is a communications software provider whose CisionOne platform pairs a media contact database and press release distribution with monitoring and analytics built to prove PR value to executives. Coverage spans print, online, TV, radio, social, podcast and magazine channels in real time. Product pages describe automated share-of-voice analysis run across every monitored channel, benchmarking a brand against named competitors in a small number of clicks rather than a manual spreadsheet exercise.

In July 2026 Cision extended that benchmarking into generative AI answers with its AI Visibility Dashboard, built on data from search-intelligence partner Trajaan. Communications teams can monitor brand presence across ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, Perplexity, Grok, DeepSeek and Google AI Overview, track visibility over time, benchmark share of voice against competitors, read sentiment in AI-generated responses, see which journalists and publications are cited, and connect all of it to media monitoring, social listening and outreach already logged in the platform, rather than running it as a separate, disconnected tool.

Cision does not publish pricing for any module; every account is quoted based on named users, which modules are included among database, monitoring, distribution and analytics, geographic coverage and contract length. Independent buyer data places small to mid-sized deployments with core modules in the tens of thousands of dollars annually, with larger enterprise contracts spanning global monitoring and high-volume distribution running well beyond that. Cision suits a large, established communications function that wants share-of-voice and AI-visibility benchmarking alongside a media database and distribution in one contract, and that already budgets for enterprise software procurement. It is a poor fit for a small team wanting a fixed price before entering a multi-step sales process, since no self-service tier exists anywhere on the site.

Potential strengths

  • CisionOne's automated share-of-voice analysis benchmarks brands against competitors across media channels in a handful of clicks
  • The AI Visibility Dashboard tracks brand appearance, sentiment and share of voice inside AI-generated answers alongside traditional coverage
  • Analytics connect to Cision's own media database and distribution tools, keeping outreach and measurement inside one workflow

Trade-offs

  • No pricing is published anywhere on the site, and every quote requires a sales conversation
  • The breadth of the Comms Cloud suite means measurement features are bundled with modules a reporting-only buyer may not need
Sources and status

Meltwater

enterprise
Consider forTeams that need a dedicated PR reporting product inside a wider media suite
Pricing notesQuote-based (checked Sep 2026)
Product referencemeltwater.com
Feature to evaluateA standalone PR Reporting product with paid, earned, owned and AI dashboards and AI-generated executive summaries

Meltwater is a media intelligence company, serving 27,000 customers worldwide, whose PR Reporting product is sold as a distinct offering within its wider monitoring and social listening suite, rather than a generic export bolted onto a monitoring dashboard. The product page positions it around communicating PR outcomes to stakeholders: real-time dashboards, share-of-voice tracking against named competitors, and sentiment analysis showing how coverage tone shifts over a campaign or reporting period, aimed at replacing hours of manual PowerPoint building.

The reporting layer draws on Meltwater's broader monitoring of online, print, broadcast and social sources, and combines paid, earned, owned and AI media into a single unified view so a communications team can show the full media mix in one report. Reports can be scheduled, auto-updated and exported as PDF or PowerPoint, and Mira, Meltwater's AI assistant, generates executive summaries so stakeholders see share of voice, sentiment trends and campaign performance without waiting for a scheduled readout.

Meltwater does not publish pricing on its own site; every plan is quoted and typically sold on an annual contract, with the media contact database and newer AI-tracking capabilities sold as separate add-on modules rather than included by default. Independent buyer research places a typical single-user starting contract at several thousand dollars a year, with median mid-market subscriptions well into five figures and enterprise deployments running higher still. Meltwater suits a mid-size to large communications team that wants a named PR reporting product inside a broader monitoring relationship it likely already has, or one specifically evaluating Meltwater for that pairing. It fits less well a small team unwilling to negotiate module-by-module scope before a final price is known, since add-ons add a procurement step before cost is confirmed.

Potential strengths

  • PR Reporting is sold as its own product with dedicated share-of-voice and sentiment-trend dashboards rather than a bolt-on report export
  • Reports combine paid, earned, owned and AI media into one view built for executive audiences
  • AI-generated executive summaries let stakeholders see share of voice and campaign performance without waiting for a scheduled readout

Trade-offs

  • Pricing is entirely quote-based and typically requires an annual contract negotiated through sales
  • The media contact database and newer AI-tracking capabilities are sold as separate add-on modules
Sources and status

Muck Rack

mid-market
Consider forPR teams that want measurement built into the same tool used for pitching
Pricing notesQuote-based (checked Sep 2026)
Product referencemuckrack.com
Feature to evaluateOutcome-based dashboards covering media impact, reputation, competitive position and journalist relationships

Muck Rack is a public relations software company best known for its journalist database and pitching tools, and it has invested specifically in measurement and reporting on top of that base product, including a dedicated Reporting and Measurement product line. In 2024 the company shipped a major set of measurement enhancements, and the current Dashboards tool offers outcome-based templates covering media impact analytics, brand reputation insights, competitive analysis and a relationship summary tracking connections with individual journalists.

The reporting layer includes widgets built for PR key performance indicators: historic comparison covering up to five years of data, total placements broken out by broadcast, digital and print media, local, national and total broadcast audience with advertising value equivalency, and share of voice by unique visitors per month, by total placements and over time. Because these dashboards sit inside the same product used to search the media database and manage pitches, reporting can draw on real outreach activity rather than a disconnected add-on reconciled manually against records kept elsewhere.

Muck Rack does not publish pricing. It offers three plans each for brand and agency customers, priced by user count and selected modules such as broadcast monitoring or social listening; independent buyer research places typical annual contracts from roughly five thousand dollars for a small team to the low tens of thousands for mid-market accounts, with Premier quoted separately for the most advanced reporting. Muck Rack suits a PR team that wants measurement built into the tool it already uses daily for research and pitching. It is a weaker fit for a team that specifically wants a published price before engaging sales, or one whose needs are narrow enough that a full media database is unnecessary overhead.

Potential strengths

  • Outcome-based dashboard templates cover media impact, brand reputation, competitive analysis and journalist relationships out of the box
  • Historic comparison widgets show up to five years of placement, broadcast audience and share-of-voice data in one view
  • Measurement sits inside the same product used for media database search and pitching, so reporting draws on real outreach activity

Trade-offs

  • Pricing is not published and is quoted per plan based on user count and selected modules
  • Advertising value equivalency remains part of the reporting toolkit despite ongoing industry debate about the metric's credibility
Sources and status

Propel AI (formerly Propel PRM)

specialist
Consider forSmall PR teams wanting attribution and productivity metrics from a CRM built for PR
Pricing notesQuote-based (checked Sep 2026)
Product referencepropelmypr.com
Feature to evaluateBusiness-outcome attribution built into the core CRM alongside pitch productivity metrics

Propel, now marketed as Propel AI and formerly sold as Propel PRM, is a public relations management platform built by former PR practitioners and positioned as the first CRM designed specifically for the profession. The product bundles a global media contact database of more than one million journalists and influencers, native Gmail and Outlook pitching plug-ins, and analytics a communications team needs to show programme results, including a proprietary Article Authority score, share-of-voice tracking and business-outcome reporting tied to traffic and conversions.

Measurement features include business-outcome attribution built into the core CRM, drill-down productivity metrics reporting pitch open, response and publish rates, and a coverage log connecting placements back to the specific outreach that produced them. Media monitoring covers thousands of news sites, forums, blogs and broadcast sources, plus social mentions, with coverage compared against named competitors. That pairing of outreach data and coverage data in one system is the product's main differentiator from tools that only ingest published coverage after the fact.

Propel AI no longer lists tiered dollar pricing on its site. Plans are named Essentials, Pro and Premium, scaling by seat count from one user up to seven, with online and print monitoring alerts rising from 10 to 25 to 50 across the tiers and business-outcome reporting included at every level. Every plan now requires booking a demo rather than checking a published price. Propel suits a small or mid-size PR team that wants attribution and productivity metrics built into a CRM designed for PR. It is a weaker fit for a team that specifically wants a visible price before talking to sales, since Propel AI's current pricing page requires booking a demo for every tier, or one wary of a rapidly repositioning vendor now marketing itself primarily around an AI agent.

Potential strengths

  • Essentials, Pro and Premium tiers scale by seat count from one user up to seven
  • Business-outcome attribution and drill-down pitch productivity metrics are built into the core CRM rather than sold separately
  • Media monitoring, journalist database access and coverage-to-pitch attribution are included at every paid tier

Trade-offs

  • Pricing for the Essentials, Pro and Premium tiers is no longer published and every plan now requires booking a demo
  • The company now markets itself primarily as an AI agent, Propel AI, and the PRM measurement features sit inside that broader repositioning
Sources and status

Agility PR Solutions

mid-market
Consider forMid-market teams that want ROI dashboards bundled with monitoring and a media database
Pricing notesQuote-based (checked Sep 2026)
Product referenceagilitypr.com
Feature to evaluateA library of customizable ROI charts built specifically for stakeholder reporting

Agility PR Solutions is a public relations software vendor whose platform pairs AI-enhanced media monitoring across online news, print, broadcast, podcasts and social channels with a measurement and reporting layer, sold as its Media Intelligence solution, aimed at proving the value of media relations to internal stakeholders. The platform is marketed separately to in-house PR teams and to agencies managing several client accounts. The company publishes an extended guide to PR measurement practice on its own site, signalling that reporting is a deliberate part of its positioning rather than an afterthought.

Inside the platform, automatic coverage tagging and a library of customizable, shareable charts convert raw coverage into a suite built for a stakeholder audience: story prominence measures, coverage briefings that can be automated or manual, and AI-generated insights that uncover coverage themes and trends across bulk mention sets. Coverage surge alerts flag significant shifts in mention volume before they show up, unexplained, in a scheduled report. Agencies get a client-segmented version of the same reporting tools, with per-client branding and briefing engagement tracking.

Pricing is not published on the dedicated plans page; the site presents features by module rather than a rate card, and cost is driven by which of media relations, monitoring, intelligence and social listening a buyer selects. Several independent review sources describe the platform as premium-priced relative to newer, self-service competitors. Agility suits a mid-market team that wants monitoring, a media database and stakeholder-ready reporting bundled into one subscription rather than assembled from separate vendors, and that is willing to negotiate a package rather than select from a rate card. It fits less well a buyer for whom price transparency at the outset is a hard requirement.

Potential strengths

  • Customizable dashboards convert coverage, share of voice and sentiment into charts built specifically for stakeholder reporting
  • Coverage surge alerts flag significant shifts in mention volume before they show up in a scheduled report
  • Measurement, monitoring and media database access are bundled in one subscription rather than sold as separate products

Trade-offs

  • Public pricing is not available, and quotes vary by selected module and distribution volume
  • Several independent review sources describe the platform as premium-priced relative to newer entrants in this comparison
Sources and status

Prowly (Semrush AI PR Toolkit)

smb
Consider forSmall teams inside the Semrush ecosystem wanting AI-cited media discovery with basic attribution
Pricing notesBase $149/mo, Pro $279/mo, billed annually (checked Sep 2026)
Product referencesemrush.com
Feature to evaluateAI-cited media database paired with a Pro-tier feature that attributes earned coverage back to a specific pitch

Prowly, the PR and media relations platform, was acquired by Semrush and relaunched in October 2025 as the Semrush AI PR Toolkit; the standalone Prowly product with its own Basic and Advanced reporting tiers is no longer sold to new customers, and prowly.com now presents the Semrush product rather than legacy Prowly pricing. The rebuilt toolkit centres on an AI-cited media database, showing which outlets and journalists large language models actually cite, alongside AI-assisted email pitching, press release creation and coverage monitoring, aimed at PR teams optimizing for both human and AI-driven discovery.

The entry Base plan covers finding AI-cited media, researching journalists with AI, drafting emails and press releases with PR-trained AI, and 500 tracked email sends. The Pro plan adds online media monitoring with AI support, mention alerts and digests, contact exports from the media database, advanced email analytics, audience and traffic insights for media outlets, follow-up automation and a feature that detects whether earned coverage can be attributed to a specific pitch sent from the toolkit, a genuine measurement capability rather than a raw monitoring feed.

Pricing is published: Base costs $149 per month and Pro costs $279 per month, both flat rates with a 7-day free trial and no permanent free tier, a simpler structure than the multi-currency annual-versus-monthly tiers the standalone product once sold. Prowly, in its current form, suits a small PR team or agency already inside the Semrush ecosystem that wants AI-visibility-aware outreach with basic attribution built in. It is a weaker fit for a team that wants the dedicated, client-facing PR Reports module the standalone product used to offer, since reporting is now secondary to media discovery and outreach rather than the product's central purpose.

Potential strengths

  • Two flat, published monthly prices replace the tiered annual pricing the standalone Prowly product once used
  • The AI-cited media database targets outlets and journalists that large language models actually cite, not just traditional reach
  • The Pro tier's pitch-to-coverage attribution is a genuine measurement feature rather than a raw monitoring feed

Trade-offs

  • The standalone Prowly product, including its dedicated Basic and Advanced PR Reports module, is no longer sold to new customers
  • Reporting and measurement are now secondary to media discovery and outreach inside the broader Semrush AI PR Toolkit
Sources and status

CoverageBook

smb
Consider forPublicists and agencies that need a fast, client-ready coverage report
Pricing notesBronze $99/mo, Bronze Plus $169/mo, Silver $229/mo, Gold $599/mo, excl. VAT (checked Sep 2026)
Product referencecoveragebook.com
Feature to evaluateFour clearly priced report tiers, from 100 to 1,200 clips a month, with custom Enterprise plans above 2,000

CoverageBook is a PR reporting tool built by CoverageBook.com for publicists, agencies and in-house teams whose primary job is to turn a list of coverage links into a polished, client-ready report rather than to discover mentions in the first place. A customer testimonial on the pricing page describes it as a recurring line item worth the monthly charge for client reporting, internal planning and new business. A user imports the URLs of articles, clips or posts that resulted from a campaign, and the tool pulls metrics automatically and lays them out as a shareable report, removing the manual work of screenshotting articles into a slide deck.

Reports can be shared online, generated as a PDF, or exported as underlying data in Excel or CSV format. There are no storage limits, no fixed contract term, and an account can be cancelled any time. An archive plan, at $15 a month, keeps past reports viewable for a client after the main subscription is paused, useful for an agency between retainer periods.

Pricing is published in four tiers, all excluding VAT: Bronze at $99 a month for 100 clips and up to five users, Bronze Plus at $169 a month for 200 clips and up to ten users, Silver at $229 a month for 400 clips, up to fifty users, team onboarding and priority support, and Gold at $599 a month for 1,200 clips, up to 100 users, bespoke onboarding and Zoom support. Custom Enterprise plans cover roughly 2,000 to more than 100,000 clips a month, with dedicated account management. CoverageBook suits a publicist who needs to compile evidence of campaign results quickly and repeatedly. It is not a fit for a team that needs the tool itself to discover coverage or attribute it to revenue.

Potential strengths

  • Four published tiers scale from 100 to 1,200 clips a month, each with an exact monthly price and no long-term contract
  • Purpose-built for turning a list of coverage links into a polished, shareable report in minutes
  • An archive plan keeps past reports viewable for clients at a reduced monthly cost, useful for pausing an active subscription

Trade-offs

  • The product compiles and formats coverage rather than discovering it, so it depends on links sourced from elsewhere
  • Attribution to revenue or conversion outcomes is not part of the toolset, unlike the enterprise measurement suites in this comparison
Sources and status

Memo

specialist
Consider forLarge brands wanting verified readership data instead of modeled impressions
Pricing notesQuote-based (checked Sep 2026)
Product referencememo.co
Feature to evaluateMemo Readership Value, built on data licensed directly from publisher partners

Memo is a communications data company, positioned as a data platform for a new era of PR measurement, that licenses readership analytics directly from publishers, an alternative to the modeled impression and advertising-value-equivalency figures long used, and long criticized, in PR measurement. Rather than estimating how many people likely saw a piece of coverage, Memo reports how many people the partnering publication itself recorded as having read a specific article, plus how long they engaged, sourced from a data marketplace connecting publishers with brands and agencies.

The core product, Memo Readership Value, converts that data into a figure showing what it would cost a marketing team to buy equivalent attention through paid channels. A web-based dashboard tracks readership on articles mentioning a brand alongside named competitors and industry peers, filterable by publication, topic, date range and headline mention, and Reporter Intelligence surfaces which journalists drive the most engagement rather than simply the most volume. An in-house Insights team can also research and analyze readership data on a breaking crisis as it unfolds. Because the data comes from publisher partnerships, figures are limited to outlets inside Memo's network.

Memo does not publish pricing; the company sells annual subscriptions negotiated directly with client teams, and its customer base, which includes Google Communications, skews toward large, well-known brands making measurement decisions based on verified readership rather than impressions. Memo suits a communications function that already questions the credibility of impression-based reporting and wants publisher-verified numbers instead, particularly one that must defend its measurement methodology to a skeptical finance or marketing audience. It is a weaker fit for a small team or one covered mainly by outlets outside Memo's publisher network, where readership data will simply not exist to report on.

Potential strengths

  • Readership Value data comes from direct publisher partnerships rather than modeled estimates, addressing a long-standing criticism of impressions and AVE
  • Article-level and aggregate readership reporting shows exactly which publications and reporters are driving engagement
  • Coverage can be filtered and compared against named competitors and industry peers inside the same dashboard

Trade-offs

  • Pricing is not published and the platform is positioned toward large brands rather than small PR teams
  • Readership data depends on the roster of publisher partnerships, so coverage in outlets outside that network is not measured the same way
Sources and status

Frequently asked questions

What do PR analytics tools actually measure?

PR analytics tools measure the outcome of a public relations programme rather than the mentions themselves: share of voice against named competitors, whether key messages appeared in coverage, the quality and authority of outlets that ran a story, sentiment across a reporting period, and, in more advanced platforms, whether coverage correlated with referral traffic, branded search lift or conversions. The goal is a report a communications leader can hand to a chief executive as evidence of impact.

How is PR analytics different from media monitoring?

Media monitoring finds and collects mentions across news, broadcast and social sources as they happen, and answers the question of what was said and where. PR analytics takes that collected coverage and turns it into a judgment about performance: how much share of voice a brand held, whether sentiment moved in the right direction, and whether the coverage produced measurable business results. Most vendors in this comparison sell both capabilities together, but the tools scored here are weighted toward the reporting and measurement layer specifically.

What is share of voice and how do these tools calculate it?

Share of voice compares a brand's volume of media coverage, sometimes weighted by outlet reach or by unique visitors per month, against a defined set of named competitors over the same period. A brand with 30 percent share of voice accounted for roughly three in ten mentions across the tracked competitive set. Tools in this comparison automate the calculation across online, print, broadcast and, increasingly, AI-generated search answers, replacing a manual count that previously required an analyst to tag and tally articles by hand.

Can PR analytics tools connect coverage to revenue or conversions?

A small number of platforms in this comparison attempt direct attribution. Onclusive markets PR Attribution as a way to connect published content to business outcomes including revenue, and Propel PRM links pitch-level activity to logged outreach so a placement traces back to the email that produced it. Most other tools stop at correlation, showing coverage volume or share of voice alongside a separate traffic or conversion chart rather than a causal link, which is a meaningfully weaker claim than true attribution.

Which PR analytics tools publish their prices?

The Semrush AI PR Toolkit (formerly Prowly) and CoverageBook publish fixed prices on their own sites: the Semrush toolkit runs $149 or $279 a month, and CoverageBook's four tiers span $99 to $599 a month. Propel AI (formerly Propel PRM) withdrew its published tiers in 2026 and now requires a demo for every plan. Onclusive publishes pricing only for its narrower GEO Analytics module, from $105 a month; its core platform is quote-only. Cision, Meltwater, Muck Rack, Agility PR Solutions and Memo publish no pricing anywhere.

How much should a PR team budget for measurement software?

Cost varies enormously by scope. A small team can get CoverageBook from $99 a month or the Semrush AI PR Toolkit from $149; Propel AI no longer publishes a price. Mid-market platforms with bundled monitoring, such as Muck Rack or Agility PR Solutions, typically run from several thousand to the low tens of thousands of dollars annually. Enterprise suites such as Onclusive, Cision, Meltwater or Memo commonly run into five and six figures a year.

Is earned media value still a credible metric?

Earned media value, a monetary figure typically derived from advertising rates, remains widely used but is increasingly treated with caution, including by vendors that still offer it, such as Muck Rack. Critics argue it converts editorial coverage into an advertising-equivalent number that does not reflect how audiences actually engage with a story. Memo's Readership Value and Onclusive's Power of Voice are explicit attempts to replace or supplement that approach with figures grounded in actual readership data or content-quality scoring rather than an assumed ad rate.

How should this comparison be used?

Use the documented product fit, source status, pricing and trade-offs to build a shortlist, then validate each finalist against your requirements, current vendor documentation and representative workflows.

Suggest a vendor or correction

Send product details or factual corrections to editorial@statwharf.com. Corrections are free. For paid profile services, contact partnerships; payment does not determine editorial coverage or ordering.

Contact partnerships

First published September 2026. Page update dates reflect editorial changes, not a fresh check of every vendor.