SStatWharf
Menu

Best Medical Coding Software (2026): Top 9 Compared

Updated October 2026By StatWharf Editorial9 vendorsMethodology

Medical coding software turns clinical documentation into ICD-10-CM, ICD-10-PCS, CPT and HCPCS codes for billing. The nine products below fall into three groups. Solventum 360 Encompass and Optum Integrity One are hospital platforms that combine computer-assisted coding, clinical documentation integrity and growing autonomous coding. Optum EncoderPro.com, Codify by AAPC and Find-A-Code are web encoders with published per-user prices for coders and practices. Fathom, CodaMetrix, Nym and Maverick Medical AI sell autonomous coding engines that send routine encounters straight to billing.

Order is not a ranking. How entries are ordered.

On this page
  1. Comparison table
  2. Vendor details
  3. Solventum 360 Encompass
  4. Optum Integrity One
  5. Optum EncoderPro.com
  6. Codify by AAPC
  7. Find-A-Code
  8. Fathom
  9. CodaMetrix
  10. Nym
  11. Maverick Medical AI
  12. How to choose
  13. Frequently asked questions
  14. Suggest a vendor

Compare at a glance

Select a vendor for details and sources. Scroll the table horizontally on smaller screens.

Medical Coding Software: vendor fit and recorded pricing
VendorConsider forPricing notesStandout
Solventum 360 EncompassenterpriseHospitals wanting facility computer-assisted coding tied to the Solventum CRS encoder and CDINot published; quoted by a Solventum sales representative Checked Oct 2026Code Confidence drops high-precision suggested codes into the coding summary as a step toward autonomy
Optum Integrity OneenterpriseHealth systems consolidating facility and professional coding, CDI and auditing on one platformNot published; Optum sales team quotes through a contact form Checked Oct 2026Autonomous-first platform that codes routine encounters and routes complex ones to coders
Optum EncoderPro.comsmbAmbulatory practices and coders wanting Optum code book content and claim edits onlineStandard $299.95, Professional $549.95, Expert $999.95 single-user list price; Payer edition $1,495.95; multi-user licences available Checked Oct 2026Expert tier runs selected codes through an automated edit review before claim submission
Codify by AAPCsmbIndividual coders, students and practices, especially AAPC members, wanting a low-cost encoderAnnual: $99–$626 per year for members, $129–$714 for non-members across four tiers; monthly billing available; enterprise by quote Checked Oct 2026Codie AI coding assistant and Smart Search across all code sets inside the encoder
Find-A-CodesmbPractices, facilities and ASCs wanting an encoder with NCCI, fee and claim scrubbing toolsProfessional $450/year or $45/month; Expert $750/year or $75/month; Facility/ASC $950/year or $95/month Checked Oct 2026Aimee AI research assistant that answers coding questions with links to sources
FathomspecialistHealth systems, physician groups and health plans automating professional, facility and risk-adjustment codingNot published; quote through a request-a-quote form Checked Oct 2026Autonomous coding that sends charts direct to bill and passes the remainder to the existing coding team
CodaMetrixspecialistIntegrated health systems on Epic automating multispecialty professional and facility codingNot published; demo and meeting request Checked Oct 2026CMX CARE builds a longitudinal view of care from notes, orders, charges and schedules before coding
NymspecialistHealth systems and physician groups automating emergency, radiology, urgent care and outpatient codingNot published; demo request Checked Oct 2026Clinical Language Understanding engine that produces an audit trail for every coded encounter
Maverick Medical AIspecialistRadiology and imaging providers wanting autonomous coding of reports with quick go-liveNot published; demo request Checked Oct 2026Guarantees an 85% direct-to-bill rate, with CodePilot checking notes before providers sign

These comparisons draw on public product information, not hands-on testing of every tool. Source records identify available references and checks; missing evidence is marked. Buyer fit is an editorial assessment, not a measured performance score. How to use this research.

Medical coding software helps hospitals, physician groups, coders and billing teams convert clinical documentation into ICD-10-CM, ICD-10-PCS, CPT and HCPCS codes that support claims, quality reporting and risk adjustment. Products range from web encoders that help a coder find and validate a code, to computer-assisted coding (CAC) that suggests codes from the record with evidence, to autonomous coding engines that code routine encounters and send them to billing without review. This category is separate from practice management software, which handles scheduling, registration and claims submission.

The market divides into three groups. Solventum 360 Encompass and Optum Integrity One are enterprise hospital platforms that combine CAC, documentation integrity and growing autonomy, sold through sales. Optum EncoderPro.com, Codify by AAPC and Find-A-Code are encoders with published per-user prices. Fathom, CodaMetrix, Nym and Maverick Medical AI sell autonomous engines, each focused on particular specialties and settings.

The comparison covers nine products. Details come from each vendor’s public product and pricing pages, checked on 13 October 2026.

Vendor details and trade-offs

Solventum 360 Encompass

enterprisesolventum.com ↗
Consider forHospitals and health systems that code inpatient and outpatient facility cases and want computer-assisted coding integrated with the Solventum Coding and Reimbursement System and clinical documentation integrity, as Solventum's product page and fact sheet describe
Pricing notesSolventum publishes no price for 360 Encompass. The fact sheet directs buyers to a Solventum sales representative or the sales line, and the system is offered on-premises or through the Solventum Cloud Platform (checked Oct 2026)
Feature to evaluateAuto-suggested diagnosis and procedure codes with an evidence view, built on the Solventum CRS decision-support logic

Solventum 360 Encompass is the hospital coding platform formerly sold as 3M 360 Encompass. It moved to Solventum when 3M spun off its health care business in 2024, and the product page notes that the computer-assisted coding module was previously the 3M product.

The computer-assisted coding (CAC) module reads the pertinent patient documentation and auto-suggests diagnosis and procedure codes, using the Solventum Coding and Reimbursement System (CRS) as its decision-support foundation. Coders see annotations and evidence colours that link each suggestion to the record, and can accept or adjust it within the code path. The fact sheet lists advanced code sequencing, single-path outpatient coding, concurrent coding, dashboards, and identification of quality measures such as potentially preventable complications and patient safety indicators before billing. A feature called Code Confidence moves historically accurate, high-confidence suggestions directly into the CRS summary screen, which Solventum describes as the first step toward autonomous coding. The wider platform page adds that its newer AI codes outpatient visits, sends routine cases to billing and passes complex ones to coders.

Ownership is in motion. On 5 August 2026 Solventum announced its intent to separate the Health Information Systems business, which it says is used by more than 75% of US hospitals, targeting completion within 12 to 18 months through a spin-off, sale or combination.

Potential strengths

  • Integrates with the Solventum CRS encoder, CDI and other 360 Encompass modules
  • Available on-premises or hosted on the Solventum Cloud Platform on AWS

Trade-offs

  • No published pricing
  • The business is being separated from Solventum, so ownership may change during a contract term
Sources and status

Optum Integrity One

enterprisebusiness.optum.com ↗
Consider forHospitals and health systems that want facility and professional coding, outpatient charging, clinical documentation integrity and auditing in one middle revenue cycle platform with autonomous coding, as Optum's product page describes
Pricing notesOptum publishes no price for Integrity One or for Enterprise Computer Assisted Coding. Both product pages lead to a sales contact form (checked Oct 2026)
Feature to evaluateClinical Language Intelligence that reviews every record, codes routine cases and surfaces documentation queries to CDI

Optum Integrity One is Optum's middle revenue cycle platform, launched in May 2025. Optum describes it as autonomous-first: it consolidates facility and professional coding, outpatient charging, clinical documentation integrity (CDI) and auditing into one interface, powered by Optum Clinical Language Intelligence (CLI).

According to the product page, CLI automates review of all clinical documentation, case identification and code assignment, and supports exception-based workflows. Routine encounters are coded automatically; when clinical signals indicate complexity, a human coder is brought in. The page gives an emergency department example in which the platform surfaces likely heart failure from the record and sends the opportunity to CDI for a provider query. Optum cites one large health system with a 50% gain in inpatient coding productivity, a vendor-reported figure.

Optum also continues to sell Enterprise Computer Assisted Coding and CDI 3D, which suggest codes for coders to review and include modules for coding and reimbursement, audit and compliance, LYNX outpatient infusion charging, the Medical Reference Engine and Power BI reporting. Buyers already on Enterprise CAC should ask how a move to Integrity One is priced and staged.

Potential strengths

  • One platform for coding, CDI, outpatient charging and audit work
  • Supports both fully autonomous and human-in-the-loop coding by case

Trade-offs

  • No published pricing
  • Best suited to enterprise hospital operations rather than single practices
Sources and status

Optum EncoderPro.com

smboptumcoding.com ↗
Consider forPhysician practices, ambulatory coders and payers that need online CPT, ICD-10-CM/PCS and HCPCS lookup with Optum reference content, NCCI edits and coverage policies, as Optum's EncoderPro.com pages describe
Pricing notesThe OptumCoding store lists EncoderPro.com Standard at $299.95, Professional at $549.95 and Expert at $999.95, each as a single-user list price, and EncoderPro.com for Payers at $1,495.95 per user. Optum's comparison chart describes these as 12-month single-user prices. Add-on modules are sold separately and multi-user licences are available (checked Oct 2026)
Feature to evaluateOptum's code book content, HCC, NCCI and LCD/NCD research and a 24-month historical content database in one web encoder

EncoderPro.com is Optum's web-based encoder for ambulatory coding, billing and reimbursement. It packages the content of Optum's coding books, including ICD-10-CM, ICD-10-PCS, CPT and HCPCS references, specialty Coding Companions, cross coders and desk references, into one online subscription in three tiers.

Optum's spotlight page says the product helps coders research Hierarchical Condition Categories, National Correct Coding Initiative (NCCI) edits, and local and national coverage determinations for medical necessity. The Expert tier adds an automated edit review that checks selected codes for unbundling, modifiers and complete diagnoses before a claim is sent to a clearinghouse or payer, plus a 24-month historical content database for use during claim adjudication.

Add-ons extend the base product. They include a Claim Appeal and Denial Support module, a Claims Batch Editor, an EncoderPro.com Plus module with specialty search, education worth 25 continuing education units and the LYNX E/M tool, a Clinical Documentation Improvement module, a library of more than 2,500 specialty articles, and an AMA CPT content module. A separate edition for payers is priced at $1,495.95 per user.

Potential strengths

  • Published single-user list prices for each tier
  • Add-ons for CDI content, claims batch editing and AMA CPT content

Trade-offs

  • An encoder only; it does not read the medical record or suggest codes
  • Many useful features are paid add-ons on top of the tier price
Sources and status

Codify by AAPC

smbaapc.com ↗
Consider forProfessional fee coders, auditors, students and small practices that want code lookup, NCCI edits, coverage lookups and a claim scrubber at a published price, with discounts for AAPC members, as AAPC's Codify page describes
Pricing notesAAPC lists four Codify tiers. Annual prices for members are $99 for Coder Search, $416 for Basic Coder, $516 for Pro Fee Coder and $626 for Complete Coder; non-members pay $129, $499, $659 and $714. Annual plans billed monthly cost members $10, $36, $44 and $54 a month, and non-members $15, $48, $57 and $66. A free trial is offered on the upper tiers, and organisations can request a quote (checked Oct 2026)
Feature to evaluateCodie AI assistant, AI Smart Search and historical code sets going back six years, from the coder credentialing association AAPC

Codify is the online encoder sold by AAPC, the US professional association that credentials medical coders. It combines code lookup across CPT, HCPCS and ICD-10-CM with official guidelines, coverage policies and AAPC reference content, sold in four tiers that build on one another.

Coder Search, aimed at students, covers code lookup, lay terms, personal notes, a code constructor and an E/M calculator. Basic Coder adds NCCI edits, NCD and LCD lookups and crosswalks. Pro Fee Coder, aimed at physician and non-physician coders, adds historical code sets, a real-time CMS-1500 scrubber, a specialty survival guide and optional add-ons. Complete Coder, aimed at inpatient coders and auditors, adds OPPS edits, DRG and ASC lookups and ICD-10-PCS.

The Codify page highlights Codie, an AI coding assistant that gives guidance inside the workflow, and an AI-powered Smart Search that searches all code sets from one box. The Historical Code Sets feature returns the tool to any quarter in the last six years, which helps when auditing older claims. Notes are saved against a code and carried forward each year, and subscribers can link Codify to AAPC eBooks. The Medicare Physician Fee Schedule tool shows RVUs, fees, modifier indicators and medically unlikely edits.

Potential strengths

  • Lowest published entry price in this comparison
  • NCCI edit checker and a CMS-1500 claim scrubber on the Pro Fee tier and above

Trade-offs

  • Inpatient features such as ICD-10-PCS and DRG lookup require the top tier
  • An encoder only; it does not code from the medical record
Sources and status

Find-A-Code

smbfindacode.com ↗
Consider forPhysician practices, billing teams, hospitals and ambulatory surgery centres that want an online encoder with NCCI validators, Medicare policies, fee tools and claim scrubbing, as Find-A-Code's site and subscription page describe
Pricing notesFind-A-Code's subscription page lists Professional at $450 a year or $45 a month, Expert at $750 a year or $75 a month, and Facility/ASC at $950 a year or $95 a month. Each plan includes 20 Aimee AI responses per user each month, shared across the account, with extra responses sold separately (checked Oct 2026)
Feature to evaluateFacility tools including an MS-DRG grouper, APC pricer and ASC payment calculator alongside the encoder

Find-A-Code is an online encoder and coding reference used by coders, billers and auditors. It covers ICD-10-CM, ICD-10-PCS, CPT, HCPCS, dental CDT codes and other code sets, with several search methods: keyword search, an index search called Click-A-Dex, a tabular browser, a code builder and a newer IntelliSearch.

The subscription page groups the main features. NCCI validation tools check CPT and HCPCS code pairs against procedure-to-procedure edits and medically unlikely edits for non-facility, facility and Medicaid settings and flag needed modifiers. Medicare articles, LCDs and NCDs appear directly on code detail pages, and official coding guidelines from CMS, the CDC and the AMA are integrated alongside the codes. Aimee, an AI research assistant, answers coding, billing and compliance questions in plain language and links each answer to sources in Find-A-Code's own content.

The wider toolset includes Medicare fee and RVU lookups, an E/M calculator, a global period calculator, an HCC risk score calculator, an MS-DRG grouper, an APC packager and pricer, an ASC payment calculator and Scrub-A-Claim, a claim scrubber. Medical dictionaries, a drug database with NDCs, CEU courses and webinars are also offered. The Facility/ASC tier is aimed at hospitals and surgery centres.

Potential strengths

  • Published monthly and annual prices with a dedicated Facility/ASC tier
  • NCCI validators for non-facility, facility and Medicaid settings

Trade-offs

  • Aimee AI responses are capped per user each month
  • An encoder only; codes are still assigned by the coder
Sources and status

Fathom

specialistfathomhealth.com ↗
Consider forHealth systems, physician groups, ambulatory clinics, value-based care providers, health plans and RCM vendors that want autonomous coding across specialties or retrospective risk-adjustment coding, as Fathom's site describes
Pricing notesFathom publishes no price. Its site offers a request-a-quote form and a demo request (checked Oct 2026)
Feature to evaluateCoding audit product that checks every chart coded by staff or a coding vendor and flags likely denials or downcoding

Fathom is a San Francisco company that sells autonomous medical coding. Its site describes a direct-to-bill service: incoming charts are reviewed, those the system can code are coded and sent to billing without human intervention, and the rest pass to the customer's existing coding operation. A second product audits every chart already coded by staff or an outsourced vendor and flags any that may cause a denial or represent unnecessary downcoding.

Fathom lists health systems, physician groups, outpatient clinics, health plans, value-based care providers and RCM vendors as customers, and covers facility and professional coding as well as retrospective HCC risk-adjustment coding. The homepage cites more than 3,000 provider sites and 63 million encounters. In a March 2026 announcement, Fathom said Your Health, a senior-focused care organisation, reached a 95.5% encounter-level automation rate on athenahealth; these are vendor-reported results.

Fathom's security page states that an outside audit firm verified its HITRUST, HIPAA and SOC 2 Type 2 compliance. In May 2026 Fathom announced a strategic investment from CVS Health Ventures, adding to backers that include GV, Founders Fund and Lightspeed Venture Partners.

Potential strengths

  • Covers professional, facility and risk-adjustment coding across care settings
  • States HITRUST, HIPAA and SOC 2 Type 2 audits on its security page

Trade-offs

  • No published pricing
  • Automation rates quoted on the site come from individual customer deployments
Sources and status

CodaMetrix

specialistcodametrix.com ↗
Consider forIntegrated health systems that want autonomous coding for professional fee and facility work across specialties such as radiology, pathology and endoscopy, within Epic workflows, as CodaMetrix's site describes
Pricing notesCodaMetrix publishes no price. Its site leads to a demo booking or meeting request (checked Oct 2026)
Feature to evaluateEpic Toolbox approval and a published coding quality framework, Rosetta, reviewed by a coding quality council

CodaMetrix began inside Mass General Brigham. Its about page explains that the Massachusetts General Physician Organization's billing office built a tool to code complex multispecialty cases after traditional CAC and rules-based tools fell short, and the company was founded in 2019 to sell it.

The platform, CMX CARE, pulls clinical notes, including ambient documentation, registration events, surgical schedules, orders, charges and provider information from the EHR and ancillary systems. It assembles these into a longitudinal view of the patient's care across days, providers and settings, then identifies services, diagnoses, documentation gaps and missed charges. CMX Automate codes and bills cases with no human intervention; CMX Amplify routes coder-reviewed decisions back into the platform; and CMX Insights reports automation performance and upstream documentation issues. The homepage highlights radiology, pathology and endoscopy capture and an inpatient professional fee coding approach.

CodaMetrix states that CMX CARE is Epic Toolbox approved, so coders work in their native Epic environment. It also publishes Rosetta, a coding quality framework reviewed by an industry coding quality council. Vendor-reported results include a 60% reduction in coding-related denials and five times faster turnaround.

Potential strengths

  • Built inside an academic health system's billing office for complex multispecialty coding
  • Coder decisions on exceptions feed back into the automation through CMX Amplify

Trade-offs

  • No published pricing
  • Aimed at large health systems rather than small practices
Sources and status

Nym

specialistnym.health ↗
Consider forHealth systems and physician groups that want autonomous coding with a traceable rationale in emergency medicine, radiology, outpatient surgery, outpatient visits, inpatient professional services or urgent care, as Nym's engine page describes
Pricing notesNym publishes no price. Its site leads to a demo request (checked Oct 2026)
Feature to evaluateRules-based clinical ontologies combined with machine learning, so each code links to the documentation and guideline behind it

Nym sells an autonomous coding engine for health systems and physician groups. The engine runs in the background, takes a first pass at each encounter, and routes those it codes successfully straight to billing. Encounters that are missing information or need more judgment go to the coding team.

Nym's approach rests on what it calls Clinical Language Understanding (CLU), which combines machine learning with rules-based clinical ontologies. The company presents this as an alternative to black-box models: every coded encounter carries an audit trail that ties the assigned codes to supporting documentation and the coding guidelines applied, so compliance teams can verify an output before a denial or audit. A monitoring view reports accuracy, coverage and exceptions.

The engine page lists six supported specialties and service lines: emergency medicine, radiology, outpatient surgery, outpatient visits, inpatient professional services and urgent care. Nym states that it integrates with major EHR environments, holds SOC 2 Type II and ISO/IEC 27001:2022 certifications, and is HIPAA compliant. Its Inova case study reports a $1.3 million reduction in annual emergency department coding costs and a 50% drop in weekly revenue held in discharged-not-final-billed status, both vendor-reported. Nym says more than 30 health systems and physician groups use it.

Potential strengths

  • Clearly stated service-line coverage that buyers can match to their own volume
  • SOC 2 Type II and ISO/IEC 27001:2022 certification stated on the engine page

Trade-offs

  • No published pricing
  • Coverage is limited to six named specialties and service lines
Sources and status

Maverick Medical AI

specialistmaverick-ai.com ↗
Consider forRadiology groups and imaging networks that want reports coded autonomously and documentation checked before sign-off, as Maverick's homepage and mCoder page describe through imaging customer case studies
Pricing notesMaverick publishes no price. Its site leads to a demo request (checked Oct 2026)
Feature to evaluatemCoder trained on two years of the customer's own documentation and coding history before go-live

Maverick Medical AI sells two products that work together from documentation to billing. mCoder reads clinical reports and assigns CPT, HCPCS and ICD-10-CM codes, sending most reports directly to billing. CodePilot runs at the report screen and checks a note in seconds, flagging missing elements that would block coding or billing so the provider can fix them before signing.

The mCoder page explains that the engine is trained on two years of the customer's documentation and coding history and combines machine learning, deep learning and transformer models. Incomplete, complex or low-confidence reports are routed to the customer's team for manual coding inside the mCoder platform, and a dashboard tracks direct-to-bill rate, accuracy and exceptions. Maverick states an 85% guaranteed direct-to-bill rate, go-live in about 90 days, and quarterly accuracy audits.

All three case studies on the homepage involve imaging: Steinberg Diagnostic Medical Imaging, an unnamed imaging network with more than 100 sites, and RadNet, with about 400 sites. Maverick reports that SDMI cut coding lag from 10 to 12 days to one day; these are vendor-reported figures. The company states HIPAA compliance and SOC 2 certification on US-based AWS infrastructure.

Potential strengths

  • States a guaranteed 85% direct-to-bill rate and go-live in about 90 days
  • Quarterly accuracy audits and a dedicated account manager

Trade-offs

  • No published pricing
  • Published case studies cover imaging rather than broader specialties
Sources and status

How to choose a vendor

Decide between an encoder, assisted coding and autonomous coding

An encoder helps a human coder look up and validate codes, edits and coverage policies; the coder still assigns every code. Computer-assisted coding reads the record and suggests codes with highlighted evidence for a coder to accept. Autonomous coding assigns codes and releases eligible encounters to billing without review, routing exceptions to staff. Many organisations need more than one: an encoder for the coding team and an engine for high-volume service lines.

Match the engine to the case mix it actually supports

Autonomous vendors publish coverage by specialty and setting rather than across all coding. Nym names six service lines, Maverick's published case studies are imaging providers, and Fathom and CodaMetrix describe broader multispecialty coverage. Buyers should send a sample of their own encounters, by specialty, and ask what share each engine would release to billing and how exceptions reach coders.

Ask how every code can be audited

Coding errors become denials, repayments or compliance findings. Every product here states that it shows the documentation behind a code, from Solventum's evidence view to Nym's per-encounter audit trail and Maverick's code-level explainability. Before signing, a compliance team should review sample audit trails, the vendor's own accuracy audit process, and how quickly annual code set updates, such as the 1 October ICD-10-CM release, reach the product.

Frequently asked questions

What is medical coding software?

Medical coding software helps translate clinical documentation into standard codes, such as ICD-10-CM diagnoses, ICD-10-PCS inpatient procedures, CPT and HCPCS services, for claims and reporting. It ranges from encoders, which help a coder look up and validate codes, to computer-assisted coding, which suggests codes from the record, to autonomous coding, which assigns codes and sends routine encounters to billing without review.

How much does medical coding software cost?

Encoders publish prices. Codify by AAPC costs $99 to $626 a year for AAPC members and $129 to $714 for non-members, Find-A-Code costs $450 to $950 a year, and Optum EncoderPro.com lists $299.95 to $999.95 per user. Hospital platforms from Solventum and Optum and autonomous engines from Fathom, CodaMetrix, Nym and Maverick publish no price and quote through sales. Figures were checked in October 2026.

What is the difference between computer-assisted coding and autonomous coding?

Computer-assisted coding reads the record and suggests codes with highlighted evidence, and a coder reviews and finalises every case. Autonomous coding assigns codes and releases eligible encounters straight to billing, while incomplete or complex encounters go to coders. Solventum and Optum began with assisted coding and now add autonomous features; Fathom, CodaMetrix, Nym and Maverick were built around autonomous coding.

Will autonomous coding replace medical coders?

The vendors here describe a hybrid model. Each routes encounters it cannot code confidently, or that lack information, to human coders, and CodaMetrix feeds those coder decisions back into its system. Nym's Inova case study reports that some emergency coders moved to more complex work. Coders also remain responsible for audits, queries and specialties the engines do not yet support.

Which tools suit a small practice or an individual coder?

Small practices and individual coders usually start with an encoder rather than an autonomous engine. Codify by AAPC, Find-A-Code and Optum EncoderPro.com publish per-user prices, offer monthly or annual terms, and include NCCI edit checks and Medicare coverage lookups. Codify is discounted for AAPC members. The autonomous engines in this comparison are sold to health systems, physician groups and imaging networks.

What happened to 3M's coding software?

3M spun off its health care business as Solventum in 2024, so 3M 360 Encompass and the 3M encoder are now sold as Solventum 360 Encompass and the Solventum Coding and Reimbursement System. On 5 August 2026 Solventum announced it intends to separate its Health Information Systems business through a spin-off, sale or combination, targeting completion within 12 to 18 months. Existing customers should watch for contract and support changes.

Does Epic offer its own autonomous coding?

At its user group meeting in August 2026, Epic said autonomous coding is available for radiology and emergency medicine, auto-coding when confidence is high and flagging cases for review when it is not, with surgery and pathology planned, according to Healthcare IT Today's coverage. Epic customers can compare this native option with third-party engines; CodaMetrix states that its platform is Epic Toolbox approved.

How was this comparison compiled?

StatWharf Editorial compared nine medical coding products using each vendor's public product, pricing and documentation pages and, for ownership changes, Solventum's press release, checked on 13 October 2026. No product was tested hands-on, and no vendor reviewed or confirmed its entry. Accuracy, automation and savings figures are quoted as vendor claims. The order is not a ranking, and inclusion is not an endorsement.

Suggest a vendor or correction

Send factual corrections to editorial@statwharf.com. Corrections are free. For inclusion or placement enquiries, contact partnerships.

Contact partnerships

First published October 2026. Page update dates reflect editorial changes, not a fresh check of every vendor.