SStatWharf
Menu

Best Logistics Management Platforms (2026): Top 10 Compared

Updated September 2026By StatWharf Editorial10 vendorsMethodology

A logistics management platform is the system of record for moving freight: rating and booking it, tendering it to carriers, tracking it, and settling the invoice. The ten platforms below split along two lines. The first is whose operation they are built around. CargoWise and Logixboard are built for freight forwarders, Turvo and Rose Rocket for brokers and carriers, Shipwell and Princeton TMX for shippers, and Infios, Descartes 3G TMS, PCS Software and nVision Global address more than one of those groups from a single product. The second is what the software is asked to own. Most here run the full order-to-settlement cycle. nVision Global starts from freight audit and payment and builds outward, and Logixboard sits on top of an existing TMS rather than replacing it. Three of the ten publish a starting price. How entries are ordered.

On this page
  1. Comparison table
  2. Vendor details
  3. CargoWise
  4. Infios Transportation Management
  5. Descartes 3G TMS
  6. Shipwell
  7. Turvo
  8. Rose Rocket
  9. PCS Software
  10. Princeton TMX
  11. Logixboard
  12. nVision Global
  13. How to choose
  14. Frequently asked questions
  15. Suggest a vendor

Compare at a glance

Select a vendor for details and sources. Scroll the table horizontally on smaller screens.

Logistics Management Platforms: vendor fit and recorded pricing
VendorConsider forPricing notesStandout
CargoWiseenterpriseFreight forwarders and customs brokers running international files end to endNot published. The pricing path is a contact form rather than a rate card (checked Sep 2026)One platform spanning forwarding, customs, warehousing and carrier connectivity
Infios Transportation ManagemententerpriseTeams running transportation across multiple modes, geographies and industriesNot published. The pricing URL is a 404 and the only call to action is to talk to an expert (checked Sep 2026)Carries the former MercuryGate and Körber Supply Chain Software TMS lineages on one platform
Descartes 3G TMSmid-marketShippers, 3PLs and 4PLs that need one rating and settlement engine across modesNot published. The pricing URL is a 404 and every call to action is a demo or contact form (checked Sep 2026)Serves shippers, 3PLs and 4PLs from one product inside the wider Descartes network
Shipwellmid-marketShippers wanting procurement through settlement on one connected systemNot published. The pricing URL serves a demo request page rather than rates (checked Sep 2026)States the whole platform runs on a single codebase with a unified interface
Turvomid-marketFreight brokers and 3PLs that need shared visibility with customers and carriersTMS tier starts at $5,000 a month; the collaboration and visibility tier is quoted on request (checked Sep 2026)One of three here publishing a starting monthly figure on its own pricing page
Rose Rocketmid-marketBrokers and carriers that want to configure the system without a vendor backlogFull Service Platform starts at $2,080 a month; the Enterprise tier is custom priced (checked Sep 2026)Publishes a guaranteed 90-day go-live alongside its starting price
PCS Softwaremid-marketCarriers and brokers that want dispatch decisions scored against their own rulesNot published. The pricing URL is a 404 and the site routes to a demo request (checked Sep 2026)An AI agent that contacts shippers directly to book return-leg freight
Princeton TMXenterpriseIndustrial shippers moving freight by truck, rail, barge and intermodalNot published. The pricing URL is a 404 and the site offers an ROI calculator and demo booking instead (checked Sep 2026)Publishes a day-by-day deployment schedule with Day 1, Day 45 and Day 90 milestones
Logixboardmid-marketFreight forwarders adding automation on top of a TMS they already runPriced by connected mailboxes from $250 a month for 1-20, $500 for 21-100 and $1,000 for 101-150; unlimited users (checked Sep 2026)Charges on connected mailboxes rather than per seat, with unlimited users on every plan
nVision GlobalenterpriseGlobal enterprises starting from freight audit and payment rather than from routingNot published. The pricing URL is a 404 and the site routes to a demo or contact request (checked Sep 2026)Builds outward from global freight audit and payment rather than adding audit to a TMS

These comparisons draw on public product information, not hands-on testing of every tool. Source records identify available references and checks; missing evidence is marked. Buyer fit is an editorial assessment, not a measured performance score. How to use this research.

Logistics management platforms are the systems freight actually runs on: they hold the orders, rate and book the shipments, tender them to carriers, track them, and settle the invoices. The ten platforms below all claim that cycle, but they do not claim it for the same buyer.

Two of the ten are not what their older names suggest. MercuryGate’s TMS is now Infios Transportation Management, after the 2024 acquisition and the March 2025 rename that also absorbed Körber Supply Chain Software. 3G TMS now markets as Descartes 3G TMS.

Pricing transparency is the sharpest divide. Turvo, Rose Rocket and Logixboard publish starting figures. The other seven route to a contact form, and four of those seven have a pricing URL that returns a 404. Every figure and capability below was checked against the vendor’s own pricing or documentation page in September 2026.

Vendor details and trade-offs

CargoWise

enterprise
cargowise.com ↗
Consider forFreight forwarders and customs brokers, because CargoWise documents bookings, documentation, carrier connections, customer updates and internal workflows as one platform rather than as separate systems per mode
Pricing notesNot published. The CargoWise pricing path is a 404 and the site routes buyers to a contact form that reads 'Fill in the form below and get in touch today'. No figure, tier or starting point appears in the navigation or body copy (checked Sep 2026)
Feature to evaluateCargoWise states that 5,700 or more product enhancements were added to the application suite over the last five years, a release cadence it publishes as a capability in its own right

CargoWise is WiseTech Global's logistics platform, and it is aimed squarely at the freight forwarder and customs broker rather than at the shipper. Its solutions navigation segments by operator type: freight forwarders, customs brokers, warehouse operators, carriers and drayage operators.

The documented promise is single-platform operation. CargoWise states that a user can manage bookings, documentation, carrier connections, customer updates and internal workflows from one platform, and can trigger status updates, automate milestones, connect directly to carrier systems and share shipment visibility in real time.

Compliance is presented as a product function rather than a process wrapped around the product. CargoWise documents enforcing compliance and maintaining control through system-driven validation and audit-ready traceability, with mode-specific booking and tracking for air, ocean and road or rail.

Potential strengths

  • Forwarding, customs, warehousing and carrier connectivity are documented as one application suite, so an international file does not change systems as it changes mode
  • Compliance is enforced in the product through system-driven validation and audit-ready traceability rather than through separate reconciliation work

Trade-offs

  • No published pricing of any kind, so cost comparison needs a sales cycle before it can begin
  • The breadth that suits a forwarder running air, ocean and road files is more platform than a single-mode domestic shipper needs
Sources and status

Infios Transportation Management

enterprise
infios.com ↗
Consider forOrganisations that need transportation, warehouse and freight settlement under one vendor, because Infios documents the product as orchestrating complex moves across every mode, geography and industry rather than as a single-mode tool
Pricing notesNot published. The Infios pricing URL returns a 404 and the transportation management page carries a single call to action reading 'Talk to an expert'. No tier, range or starting figure is published (checked Sep 2026)
Feature to evaluateInfios states plainly that 'MercuryGate's TMS is now Infios Transportation Management' and that MercuryGate and Körber Supply Chain Software are both now Infios, so two established TMS product lines sit behind one platform

Infios is the current name for the transportation platform that shippers and brokers knew as MercuryGate. The company states the change directly: "MercuryGate's TMS is now Infios Transportation Management (TM). With the same proven capabilities, it orchestrates complex transportation moves across every mode, geography and industry."

The lineage matters when checking references. Infios's own answer to whether MercuryGate and Körber Supply Chain Software are now Infios is "Yes". MercuryGate was acquired into the Körber Supply Chain Software business in 2024, and that software business was renamed Infios in March 2025.

The documented module set runs wider than transportation alone: freight audit and payment, claims management, vehicle routing and optimisation, shipment and order visibility, and global trade. Infios documents predictive AI that identifies transportation risks before they become disruptions, and agentic AI that resolves shipment exceptions with graduated autonomy. It states it serves more than 5,000 customers in over 70 countries.

Potential strengths

  • The transportation product sits beside warehouse, freight audit, claims and global trade modules from the same vendor, which removes an integration boundary for teams that need more than routing
  • Infios documents predictive AI that identifies transportation risks before they become disruptions and agentic AI that resolves shipment exceptions with graduated autonomy

Trade-offs

  • Buyers searching for MercuryGate or Körber Supply Chain Software will not find a separate product, which complicates reference checks against pre-2025 material
  • No published pricing, and the breadth of the portfolio makes the scope of a quote harder to bound than with a single-module vendor
Sources and status

Descartes 3G TMS

mid-market
3gtms.com ↗
Consider forShippers, 3PLs and 4PLs, because 3G TMS documents rating, carrier management, visibility and settlement as one cycle and segments its own navigation by those three operator types
Pricing notesNot published. The 3G TMS pricing URL returns a 404 and every call to action on the site is a demo booking or a contact form. No tier or starting figure is published (checked Sep 2026)
Feature to evaluateThe product now markets as Descartes 3G TMS, which places a mid-market transportation system inside a logistics network that also carries customs, visibility and parcel products

3G TMS now markets as Descartes 3G TMS, and the site title reads "Descartes 3G TMS: Unified Transportation Management Software". The About copy places it inside a company that states it has been a logistics technology provider for over thirty years.

The navigation answers the buyer question first. 3G TMS lists shippers, 3PLs and 4PLs as the operators it serves, and the shipper page leads with 'Deliver smarter with a modern TMS for shippers.'

The documented capability set follows the freight cycle. Rating and optimisation compares rates and optimises load creation across modes. Carrier management covers structured onboarding, enforced compliance and measurable performance. Visibility supplies real-time shipment status and proactive alerts. Settlement and invoicing is framed around accurate audit, faster payment and fewer billing disputes. An automation layer is described as exception-focused AI that keeps the user in control.

Potential strengths

  • Rating and load optimisation, carrier management, visibility and settlement are documented as one connected cycle rather than as separately licensed modules
  • Carrier management is described in operational terms, covering structured onboarding, enforced compliance and measurable performance

Trade-offs

  • No published pricing, so the cost of the platform against a smaller point tool cannot be compared before a call
  • The Descartes rebrand means older 3Gtms reviews and comparisons refer to a product whose positioning and roadmap now sit inside a larger portfolio
Sources and status

Shipwell

mid-market
shipwell.com ↗
Consider forShippers, because Shipwell titles its platform page as a transportation management system for shippers and documents procurement, execution, visibility and settlement as one connected path
Pricing notesNot published. The Shipwell pricing URL resolves to the 'Request a Demo' page, which carries the same navigation and footer as the rest of the site and no rate content. No figure appears anywhere in the fetched page (checked Sep 2026)
Feature to evaluateShipwell states that it runs on a single codebase with a unified interface, so every capability from procurement through settlement is connected rather than assembled from acquired parts

Shipwell is a transportation management platform aimed at shippers, and its platform page title says so directly. The company states it turned ten in July 2026, and it carries a site-wide banner stating it was named a Visionary in the 2026 Gartner Magic Quadrant for Transportation Management Systems.

The architectural claim is the centre of the pitch. Shipwell states that it runs on a single codebase with a unified interface, so every capability from procurement through settlement is connected.

The documented capabilities run past core routing. Dock scheduling addresses productivity at the door. Document processing replaces manual document review with searchable, structured data. Load optimisation consolidates freight into more cost-effective truckloads. Settlements covers automated freight audits and payments. Visibility is described as multimodal across the transportation network. RFP automation and the AI worker modules are stated as available standalone. Shipwell states an uptime target of six nines and SOC 2 Type 2 compliance.

Potential strengths

  • RFP automation and the AI worker modules are documented as available standalone, so a shipper can adopt one function without replacing an incumbent system first
  • The module list covers the parts that usually sit outside a TMS, including dock scheduling, document processing and automated freight audit and payment

Trade-offs

  • The pricing URL is a demo form rather than a rate card, so nothing about cost is knowable before a sales conversation
  • A single-codebase platform is harder to adopt partially than a suite of separately licensed tools, despite the standalone modules
Sources and status

Turvo

mid-market
turvo.com ↗
Consider forFreight brokers and 3PLs, because Turvo documents configurable roles for carrier sales, finance admins, customer service and tracking support, which describes a brokerage floor rather than a single shipper's team
Pricing notesPublished in part. The Turvo pricing page states its TMS tier, covering planning, executing and settling freight, 'Starts at $5,000 / Month' and includes a dedicated onboarding manager. The second tier, covering collaboration and visibility across the supply chain, is listed as available upon request. No annual discount or user minimum is stated on the page (checked Sep 2026)
Feature to evaluateTurvo publishes a monthly starting figure for its TMS tier on its own pricing page, which most platforms in this category replace with a contact form

Turvo is a transportation platform whose solutions navigation names four buyers: freight brokers, 3PLs, shippers and carriers. The freight broker page leads that set.

Turvo is one of only three platforms here that publishes a figure. The pricing page states that the TMS tier, covering planning, executing and settling freight, starts at $5,000 a month and includes a dedicated onboarding manager. The second tier, covering collaboration and visibility across the supply chain, is listed as available upon request.

The documented capabilities lean toward operational speed and shared context. Turvo states that moving an order to a shipment takes three clicks, against a claim that other systems require over 150 clicks per shipment. Integrations to load boards, freight indexes, tracking providers, telematics and accounting systems are described as self-service. Roles are configurable for operators, carrier sales, finance admins, customer service representatives and tracking support.

Potential strengths

  • A published starting figure of $5,000 a month lets a broker size the platform before committing to a sales cycle
  • Self-service integrations are documented for load boards, freight indexes, tracking providers, telematics and accounting systems, which are the connections a brokerage needs first

Trade-offs

  • The stated starting figure sets a floor that puts the platform out of reach for a small brokerage running a handful of loads a week
  • Only the TMS tier carries a figure; the collaboration and visibility tier is quoted, so the full picture still needs a call
Sources and status
  • Product reference
  • Pricing source
  • Billing terms: Stated monthly starting price for the TMS tier; the visibility tier is quoted
  • Source review: checked Sep 23, 2026
  • Vendor confirmation: not confirmed

Rose Rocket

mid-market
roserocket.com ↗
Consider forFreight brokers and carriers, because Rose Rocket titles its pricing page as TMS plans for brokers and carriers and documents no-code configuration aimed at teams that cannot wait on a vendor roadmap
Pricing notesPublished in part. The Rose Rocket pricing page lists a Full Service Platform tier 'Starting at $2080/month' and an Enterprise tier at custom pricing, both routed through a sales conversation. The page also carries comparison figures for alternative approaches, including $150,000 to $500,000 for a custom enterprise build; those describe other options, not Rose Rocket's own price (checked Sep 2026)
Feature to evaluateRose Rocket publishes a guaranteed 90-day go-live next to its starting price, and quantifies configuration in minutes rather than in vendor backlog time

Rose Rocket positions itself against templated transportation software. Its pricing page is titled "Rose Rocket Pricing — TMS Plans for Brokers & Carriers", and the page frames the product as the anti-templated transportation platform.

It publishes a figure. The Full Service Platform tier starts at $2,080 a month, and an Enterprise tier is custom priced. Alongside the figure, Rose Rocket publishes a guaranteed go-live in 90 days and quantifies configuration speed in minutes, contrasting that with a generic cloud TMS at six or more months and a custom enterprise build at twelve to twenty-four months. Those comparison figures describe alternatives rather than Rose Rocket's own cost.

The capability set covers the usual broker and carrier cycle: order management, load tendering, dispatch, document generation, track and trace, freight audit and pay, and invoicing. Around it sit no-code builders for custom fields and automations, and three named AI agents included at no per-use fee.

Potential strengths

  • No-code builders let a team add custom fields and automations without filing a vendor feature request, which is the usual bottleneck on a configured TMS
  • Three named AI agents are included in the platform rather than metered, covering inbound email to order conversion, order assistance and onboarding

Trade-offs

  • The canonical domain blocks automated requests, so the published pricing sits on a separate marketing subdomain rather than the main site
  • A stated starting point of $2,080 a month still assumes an operation large enough to justify a platform rather than a spreadsheet
Sources and status
  • Product reference
  • Pricing source
  • Billing terms: Stated monthly starting price for the Full Service Platform tier; Enterprise is quoted
  • Source review: checked Sep 23, 2026
  • Vendor confirmation: not confirmed

PCS Software

mid-market
pcssoft.com ↗
Consider forCarriers and brokers with their own fleet, because PCS documents driver recommendations scored on hours of service, equipment, lane history and restrictions, which only matters when the buyer dispatches drivers
Pricing notesNot published. The PCS Software pricing URL returns a 404 reading 'The page you are looking for does not exist', and no figure appears on the homepage or the about page. Every call to action routes to a demo request (checked Sep 2026)
Feature to evaluatePCS documents Backhaul Booster as an agent that finds return legs and then handles the outreach itself, emailing or calling shippers, rather than only surfacing the opportunity

PCS Software describes itself as a cloud TMS built for carriers, brokers and shippers, and its about page states the journey began in 1996. It states it is trusted by more than 1,000 carriers, brokers and shippers, from operations running 25 trucks to those running over 1,000, and lists a Houston headquarters.

The documented capabilities centre on dispatch decisions. Driver recommendations are scored using 36 or more data points covering hours of service, equipment, lane history and restrictions. Load Opportunity Ranking scores available freight against the customer's own rules.

The most distinctive documented feature is Backhaul Booster, which PCS describes as finding the smartest return legs and then handling the outreach itself, emailing or calling shippers. That is an agent performing outbound contact on the customer's behalf rather than surfacing a recommendation for a human to act on. Accounting is documented as connecting dispatch and billing automatically.

Potential strengths

  • Driver recommendations are scored against 36 or more data points including hours of service, equipment, lane history and restrictions, which is dispatch-specific rather than generic optimisation
  • Accounting is documented as connected to dispatch and billing automatically, so settlement does not need a second system

Trade-offs

  • No published pricing at all, and the pricing URL itself is a dead link
  • The product is built around carriers and brokers with drivers, so a shipper without a fleet uses a narrower part of it
Sources and status

Princeton TMX

enterprise
princetontmx.com ↗
Consider forIndustrial shippers, because Princeton TMX states that positioning on its homepage and documents execution across truck, rail, fleet, barge and intermodal rather than road freight alone
Pricing notesNot published. The Princeton TMX pricing URL returns a 404 reading 'This page missed its connection'. The homepage and about page contain no figures, offering an ROI calculator and demo booking instead (checked Sep 2026)
Feature to evaluatePrinceton TMX publishes a named deployment methodology with Day 1, Day 45 and Day 90 milestones, moving from implementation sessions through integration and stress-testing to user training and quarterly reviews

Princeton TMX states its position in a single line on the homepage: the TMS for industrial shippers. Its about page states the company has worked with industrial shippers for twenty years and records SOC 1 Type 2 compliance.

Mode coverage is the substantive difference. Princeton TMX documents execution across truck, rail, fleet, barge and intermodal. Most platforms in this comparison are road-first and treat rail or barge as an exception path, which makes them awkward for bulk and heavy industry.

The documented capability set covers workflow automation that surfaces exceptions and enforces business rules automatically, network optimisation that optimises routes, loads and capacity at scale, and AI analytics and reporting with a chat agent for interrogating the data. Dock scheduling, procurement events and freight audit are documented as further modules.

Potential strengths

  • Rail, barge and intermodal are documented as first-class modes, which matters to bulk and industrial shippers that most road-first platforms serve poorly
  • The published Day 1, Day 45 and Day 90 schedule gives a buyer a concrete implementation timeline to hold the vendor to

Trade-offs

  • No published pricing and a dead pricing URL, so cost needs a sales conversation
  • The industrial shipper focus makes it a poor fit for a broker or forwarder, whose workflows the product does not target
Sources and status

Logixboard

mid-market
logixboard.com ↗
Consider forFreight forwarders that already run a TMS, because Logixboard documents its Helm product as creating and updating shipments in the customer's existing system rather than replacing it
Pricing notesPublished. Logixboard prices Helm Core on connected mailboxes: Starter at $250 a month for 1 to 20 mailboxes, Growth at $500 a month for 21 to 100, Scale at $1,000 a month for 101 to 150, and Enterprise above 150 mailboxes quoted by sales. The page states billing is monthly, every plan includes unlimited users, and there is no per-seat charge (checked Sep 2026)
Feature to evaluateLogixboard states that Helm Core is priced on the mailboxes a forwarder connects and nothing else, with unlimited users and no per-seat charge, which is a different metric from every other platform here

Logixboard takes the opposite approach to most of this list. Rather than being the transportation system of record, its Helm product sits on top of one. Logixboard documents Helm as reading emails and documents, drafting updates and flagging exceptions, then creating and updating shipments in the customer's existing TMS.

The buyer is specific. Logixboard describes Helm as operations and visibility for freight forwarders.

Pricing is published in more detail than anywhere else in this comparison, and on an unusual metric. Helm Core is priced on the mailboxes a forwarder connects, such as ops, bookings and documents addresses. Starter covers 1 to 20 mailboxes at $250 a month, Growth covers 21 to 100 at $500, Scale covers 101 to 150 at $1,000, and Enterprise above 150 is quoted.

Logixboard states it was founded in 2016, has been based in Seattle since 2018, and as of 2026 records $50 million in venture capital, over 100 people and customers in 15 countries.

Potential strengths

  • Pricing is published in full, with four named tiers and an explicit statement that users are unlimited and never charged per seat
  • It works with an existing TMS rather than against it, so a forwarder can add automation without a platform migration

Trade-offs

  • It assumes a TMS is already in place, so it cannot serve as a system of record on its own
  • Pricing by mailbox count rewards consolidated inboxes and penalises forwarders that have split ops, bookings and documents across many addresses
Sources and status
  • Product reference
  • Pricing source
  • Billing terms: Monthly, priced by the number of connected mailboxes, with unlimited users on every tier
  • Source review: checked Sep 23, 2026
  • Vendor confirmation: not confirmed

nVision Global

enterprise
nvisionglobal.com ↗
Consider forGlobal enterprises with freight spend across many countries and carriers, because nVision Global leads with global invoice audit and payment and documents partnerships with more than 20,000 transportation providers
Pricing notesNot published. The nVision Global pricing URL returns a 404 reading 'Oops, This Page Could Not Be Found', and no figure appears on the homepage or about page. The site routes buyers to a demo or contact request (checked Sep 2026)
Feature to evaluatenVision Global leads with global freight audit and payment and adds Impact TMS, procurement and claims around it, which inverts the usual order in which these platforms are assembled

nVision Global approaches logistics management from the invoice rather than from the load. It describes itself as a global business partner to many Fortune 500 companies and states it was founded in 1992.

Freight audit and payment sits at the centre. Around it, nVision Global documents Impact TMS as an automated order management system allowing shipment creation, ratings, spot quotes and reverse auction, with tender booking and track and trace. Claims management, procurement and a business intelligence layer called nSight complete the set.

nVision Global states it partners with more than 20,000 transportation providers worldwide and supports customers from seven corporate facilities across three continents and twelve countries, with a headquarters in McDonough, Georgia.

Potential strengths

  • Freight audit and payment is the core rather than a late module, which suits a buyer whose first problem is invoice accuracy across many countries
  • Claims management and procurement are documented as part of the same platform, covering work that most transportation systems leave to separate vendors

Trade-offs

  • No published pricing and a dead pricing URL, so cost needs a sales conversation
  • The site does not name shippers, brokers or forwarders as its buyer in those terms, which leaves fit to be established in the first call
Sources and status

How to choose a vendor

Decide whether the platform replaces your TMS or sits on top of it

These products do not occupy the same slot. CargoWise, Infios Transportation Management, Descartes 3G TMS, Shipwell, Turvo, Rose Rocket, PCS Software and Princeton TMX are each the transportation system of record. Logixboard documents the opposite design: its Helm product reads email and documents and then creates and updates shipments in the customer's existing TMS, which means it assumes one is already running. nVision Global leads with freight audit and payment and offers Impact TMS alongside it. Asking a vendor which of the two roles it expects to play removes most of the confusion in a first call.

Check the pricing metric, not only the number

The three published figures here are not measured the same way. Turvo states its TMS tier starts at $5,000 a month. Rose Rocket states its Full Service Platform starts at $2,080 a month. Logixboard prices on the number of connected mailboxes, from $250 a month for one to twenty, and states that every plan includes unlimited users with no per-seat charge. A per-mailbox figure and a platform figure are not comparable without knowing how many desks, users and shipments each covers. The other seven quote.

Frequently asked questions

What is a logistics management platform?

A logistics management platform is the system of record for moving freight. It holds the orders, rates and books the shipments, tenders them to carriers, tracks them in transit, and settles the carrier invoice at the end. The term overlaps heavily with transportation management system, and most vendors here use both words. The practical distinction is scope: a platform usually claims to cover more of the cycle than routing alone, adding procurement, document handling, customer visibility or freight audit to the same product.

Which logistics management platforms publish their pricing?

Three of the ten here publish a figure. Turvo states its TMS tier starts at $5,000 a month and includes a dedicated onboarding manager, with its collaboration and visibility tier quoted on request. Rose Rocket states its Full Service Platform starts at $2,080 a month, with an Enterprise tier at custom pricing. Logixboard publishes four tiers priced on connected mailboxes, from $250 a month for 1 to 20 up to $1,000 a month for 101 to 150, with unlimited users on every plan. CargoWise, Infios, Descartes 3G TMS, Shipwell, PCS Software, Princeton TMX and nVision Global all route to a contact form, and four of those seven have a pricing URL that returns a 404.

Is MercuryGate still a separate product?

No. Infios states that MercuryGate's TMS is now Infios Transportation Management, and answers the direct question about whether MercuryGate and Körber Supply Chain Software are now Infios with 'Yes'. MercuryGate was acquired into the Körber Supply Chain Software business in 2024, and that software business was renamed Infios in March 2025. Reviews, analyst notes and comparison material published under either the MercuryGate or the Körber Supply Chain Software name describe the product now sold as Infios Transportation Management.

What is the difference between a platform built for shippers and one built for brokers?

The workflows differ at the point where money is made. A shipper platform such as Shipwell or Princeton TMX optimises for cost and service on freight the buyer owns, so procurement, rate comparison and on-time performance lead. A broker platform such as Turvo or Rose Rocket optimises for margin on freight the buyer resells, so carrier sales, load coverage, customer quoting and settlement on both sides lead. Turvo's configurable roles for carrier sales, finance admins and tracking support describe a brokerage floor. Princeton TMX's rail, barge and intermodal coverage describes an industrial shipper.

Do any of these platforms work alongside an existing TMS rather than replacing it?

Logixboard is the clearest example. It documents its Helm product as reading emails and documents, drafting updates and flagging exceptions, then creating and updating shipments in the customer's existing TMS. That design assumes a system of record is already running. nVision Global is a partial case: freight audit and payment can be adopted without moving transportation execution, with Impact TMS available separately. The other eight platforms here are each intended to be the system of record.

Which platforms handle modes other than road freight?

CargoWise documents mode-specific booking and tracking for air, ocean and road or rail, which is the expected coverage for a freight forwarding platform. Princeton TMX documents truck, rail, fleet, barge and intermodal execution, aimed at industrial shippers. Infios describes orchestrating complex transportation moves across every mode and geography. Descartes 3G TMS documents rate comparison and load optimisation across modes. Shipwell describes its visibility as multimodal. Platforms built primarily for domestic truckload brokerage, such as Rose Rocket and PCS Software, concentrate on road.

How long do these platforms take to implement?

Only two publish a commitment. Rose Rocket publishes a guaranteed go-live in 90 days and contrasts that with a generic cloud TMS at six or more months and a custom enterprise build at twelve to twenty-four months. Princeton TMX publishes a staged model with Day 1, Day 45 and Day 90 milestones, running from implementation sessions through system integration and stress-testing to user training and quarterly business reviews. The other eight do not publish an implementation timeline, so it has to be established during the sales conversation and written into the contract.

What should a buyer confirm before signing with any platform here?

Four things that the public pages do not settle. First, whether the platform replaces the existing TMS or sits on top of it, because Logixboard and the rest answer that differently. Second, what the pricing metric actually counts, since a per-mailbox figure, a platform figure and a quoted enterprise figure are not comparable. Third, which modes are first-class rather than exception paths, which matters for rail, barge and ocean freight. Fourth, the implementation timeline in writing, since only two vendors here publish one.

Suggest a vendor or correction

Send factual corrections to editorial@statwharf.com. Corrections are free. For inclusion or placement enquiries, contact partnerships.

Contact partnerships

First published September 2026. Page update dates reflect editorial changes, not a fresh check of every vendor.