SStatWharf
Menu

Best Fraud Detection Software (2026): Top 10 Compared

Updated September 2026By StatWharf Editorial10 vendorsMethodology

Fraud detection software scores transactions, accounts and payments to separate genuine activity from fraud. The ten vendors fit different buyers. Stripe Radar suits Stripe merchants, and SEON offers API-first checks for online businesses, fintechs and gaming operators. Signifyd and Riskified tie approvals to a chargeback guarantee for ecommerce merchants and charge on approved orders. Forter and Sift serve large merchants and digital marketplaces. Sardine, Feedzai, Featurespace and NICE Actimize target fintechs, banks, issuers and processors. Only Stripe Radar and SEON publish price figures; the other eight quote.

Order is not a ranking. How entries are ordered.

On this page
  1. Comparison table
  2. Vendor details
  3. Stripe Radar
  4. SEON
  5. Sift
  6. Signifyd
  7. Riskified
  8. Forter
  9. Sardine
  10. Feedzai
  11. Featurespace
  12. NICE Actimize
  13. Frequently asked questions
  14. Suggest a vendor

Compare at a glance

Select a vendor for details and sources. Scroll the table horizontally on smaller screens.

Fraud Detection Software: vendor fit and recorded pricing
VendorConsider forPricing notesStandout
Stripe Radarmid-marketStripe merchants wanting fraud screening without a separate integrationLite included with Stripe payments; Standard, Plus, Pro from $10, $14, $20/mo or pay as you go; platform from $20/mo; enterprise custom Checked Sep 2026Screening inside the payment flow; paid tiers add rules and risk scores
SEONmid-marketOnline businesses, fintechs and gaming operators wanting API-first fraud checksStarter $699/mo with 2,500 fraud checks, 10 users and 50 custom rules; Premium custom Checked Sep 2026Published monthly entry price with a defined fraud-check allowance
Siftmid-marketDigital businesses and marketplaces with in-house fraud analystsQuote-based; no pricing page published Checked Sep 2026Sub-150 ms scoring with explainability and workflow simulation
Signifydmid-marketEcommerce merchants wanting approved orders backed by a chargeback guaranteePercentage of approved order total, rate set by quote; no charge on fraud declines Checked Sep 2026Guarantee ranges from fraud-only cover to full chargeback liability shift
RiskifiedenterpriseEnterprise ecommerce, travel and digital goods merchants wanting guaranteed approvalsQuote-based; Chargeback Guarantee charges only for approved orders Checked Sep 2026Guaranteed approval rates with chargeback cover, plus a policy-abuse product
ForterenterpriseLarge merchants wanting one processor-agnostic fraud and payments decision layerQuote-based; pricing page is a contact-sales form Checked Sep 2026Vendor-sized network of 2 billion+ identities across 250,000 storefronts
Sardinemid-marketFintechs, banks and merchants scoring card and ACH, RTP and FedNow fraudQuote-based; no pricing page published Checked Sep 2026Card and bank payment fraud, including ACH return prediction
FeedzaienterpriseBanks and processors needing real-time fraud detection across every channelQuote-based; no pricing page published Checked Sep 2026Per-customer risk profiles plus a network-wide TrustScore
FeaturespaceenterpriseBanks, issuers and processors wanting adaptive behavioural fraud and scam analyticsQuote-based; no pricing page published Checked Sep 2026Adaptive Behavioral Analytics, now in Visa's Risk and Identity Solutions unit
NICE ActimizeenterpriseBanks and credit unions wanting enterprise fraud management across payments and scamsQuote-based; no pricing published Checked Sep 2026IFM spans payments, scams, mules and new accounts; Xceed serves community banks

These comparisons draw on public product information, not hands-on testing of every tool. Source records identify available references and checks; missing evidence is marked. Buyer fit is an editorial assessment, not a measured performance score. How to use this research.

Fraud detection software scores payments, orders and account activity for fraud risk, then approves, challenges or blocks them, usually in milliseconds. Buyers also search for these products as fraud prevention software or transaction fraud detection tools. The market serves two distinct buyer groups, and this page covers both.

The first group is ecommerce merchants, marketplaces and digital businesses facing stolen cards, account takeover and chargebacks. Stripe Radar, SEON and Sift sell detection and tooling for in-house fraud teams, while Signifyd, Riskified and Forter pair decisions with chargeback guarantees or broader commerce decisioning. The second group is banks, card issuers, acquirers and processors monitoring card payments, transfers and instant payments for scams and mule activity. Feedzai, Featurespace and NICE Actimize are built for that setting. A separate comparison of fraud detection software for banks covers bank-focused vendors not listed here. Sardine publishes material for both groups. All pricing notes were checked in September 2026. Entries with dated source checks appear first. That order records research readiness. It is not a measure of product quality or a ranking.

Related pages cover AML software, sanctions screening software and payment processing solutions.

Vendor details and trade-offs

Stripe Radar

mid-marketstripe.com ↗
Consider forBusinesses already taking card payments on Stripe that want transaction fraud screening without a separate integration, with an enterprise option for non-Stripe payments
Pricing notesRadar Lite included on standard Stripe payments pricing; Standard from $10, Plus from $14, Pro from $20 a month, or pay as you go; platform tiers from $20, $44 and $70 a month; enterprise custom (checked Sep 2026)
Feature to evaluateFraud screening sits inside the payment flow, with published subscription tiers that add custom rules, risk scores and abuse signals

Stripe Radar is the fraud detection product built into Stripe's payments platform. Stripe's documentation explains that Radar evaluates transactions in real time and that every Radar pricing tier charges a fee for each transaction it evaluates, including recurring payments. Stripe Billing users are the exception and are billed only for the first transaction in a subscription. The pricing page also states that Radar's AI works across a business whether or not Stripe processes its payments, although protection for payments outside Stripe is listed under the enterprise option.

The tier structure is published. Radar Lite covers AI-based fraud prevention for card payments, card testing prevention and fraud alerts, and is included at no additional charge for businesses on standard Stripe payments pricing. For individual businesses, Radar Standard starts at $10 a month, Radar Plus at $14 a month and Radar Pro at $20 a month, each with a pay-as-you-go alternative. Platforms and marketplaces have their own tiers starting at $20, $44 and $70 a month. Enterprise buyers can request tailored recommendations, custom pricing and access to Radar's risk signals. The pay-as-you-go per-transaction rates sit behind an expandable panel on the pricing page and were not recorded for this comparison.

The comparison table on the pricing page shows what each tier adds. Standard covers fraud prevention across all payment methods, default rules, allowlists and blocklists, early fraud warning signals and a three-level risk rating. Plus adds numeric risk scores, custom rules with backtesting, manual reviews, risk preferences, Adaptive 3D Secure, Smart Refunds and Radar Assistant. Pro adds dynamic risk thresholds and abuse signals for free trial abuse, bots, multi-account behaviour and account sharing.

The clearest fit is a merchant or platform already processing cards on Stripe. Banks monitoring account-to-account transfers are outside the product's stated focus.

Potential strengths

  • Starting prices for each tier are published
  • No separate integration for merchants already processing on Stripe

Trade-offs

  • Pay-as-you-go per-transaction rates were not recorded from the pricing page
  • Designed around Stripe payments; non-Stripe coverage requires the enterprise route
Sources and status

SEON

mid-marketseon.io ↗
Consider forOnline businesses, fintechs and gaming operators that want API-first fraud checks with a published entry plan, and the option to add AML compliance later
Pricing notesStarter $699 a month with 2,500 fraud checks, 10 users and 50 custom rules; Premium custom (checked Sep 2026)
Feature to evaluateOne of the few fraud platforms with a published monthly entry price and a defined fraud-check allowance

SEON is a fraud prevention platform that has extended into AML compliance, and it also appears on the StatWharf AML software page for that reason. On this page the focus is the fraud line. The pricing page describes an API-first approach intended to be connected quickly, and says the platform draws on more than 1,000 online and device signals to identify risky users and transactions. SEON's own case study quotes on that page cite uses such as payment fraud reduction, bonus abuse prevention and multi-accounting detection at registration. Those figures are vendor-reported.

Pricing is unusually transparent for the category. The Starter plan costs $699 a month and includes SEON platform and API access, 2,500 fraud checks a month, 10 users and 50 custom rules. Implementation help on Starter comes through support tickets and email, with basic monitoring and standard reporting. The Premium plan is priced on request. It adds case management and AML compliance, unlimited API calls, unlimited users and unlimited custom rules, a dedicated implementation team, round-the-clock support with hands-on account management, and Managed Risk Services, which the vendor describes as consultative support with tailored strategies.

The two-tier structure suggests a practical path for smaller online businesses. A merchant, marketplace or gaming operator can begin on Starter with a defined monthly budget and a fixed check allowance, then move to Premium once volumes grow or once compliance obligations require case management. Buyers should ask what happens when checks exceed the Starter allowance, because the pricing page does not state an overage rate.

Banks with large transaction monitoring estates are not the audience the pricing page describes. SEON positions Starter at small and medium-sized businesses and Premium at organisations that want protection across the whole customer journey. Buyers comparing it with guarantee-based vendors should note that SEON sells detection and tooling, not chargeback liability cover.

Potential strengths

  • Published Starter price and check allowance
  • Premium adds case management and AML compliance on the same platform

Trade-offs

  • The cost of checks beyond the 2,500 Starter allowance is not published
  • Premium, which includes case management, is priced on request
Sources and status

Sift

mid-marketsift.com ↗
Consider forDigital businesses and marketplaces with in-house fraud analysts that want explainable risk scores, configurable workflows and coverage of payment fraud plus account takeover
Pricing notesQuote-based; no pricing page is published (checked Sep 2026)
Feature to evaluateSub-150 millisecond transaction scoring with score explainability and workflow simulation against historical traffic

Sift describes itself as a fraud prevention platform for digital businesses, combining AI and machine learning models, configurable workflows, identity-centric global data and expert analysts. Its homepage cites a global data network of more than 1 trillion annual events and names Hertz, Yelp and Poshmark among its customers. The platform covers payment fraud, account takeover and account abuse across the account, transaction and post-transaction stages.

The Payment Protection product is the part most relevant to transaction fraud. Sift states that every transaction is scored in under 150 milliseconds using device, behaviour, network and identity signals, with more than 16,000 risk signals behind each score. The vendor describes a patented ensemble of models that retrains continuously as fraud patterns shift, plus global, cohort and custom models. Fraud types listed include stolen card fraud, card testing, buy-online-pick-up-in-store abuse, alternative payment method fraud and fraudulent currency movement.

Control is the main theme. Sift contrasts its approach with black-box scores and points to Score Explainability, network visualisation and transaction activity views, so analysts can see why a decision was made. Teams can test policies and thresholds against historical traffic before they go live, build workflows in a no-code decision engine, and decide in bulk from the console. The vendor also lists dispute data ingestion, historical chargeback import, pre-built workflow templates, PSD2 compatibility and turnkey integrations with identity verification, 3D Secure, KYC and AML providers.

Sift does not publish prices. Its pricing paths return no page, and buyers are directed to sales for a quote. The product suits organisations with a fraud or trust and safety team that wants to tune decisions itself. Merchants that would rather hand over fraud losses to a vendor may prefer the guarantee-based providers on this page.

Potential strengths

  • Decisions are explainable to analysts rather than delivered as a bare score
  • No-code decision engine and policy testing before changes go live

Trade-offs

  • No published pricing
  • Sells detection and tooling rather than a chargeback guarantee
Sources and status

Signifyd

mid-marketsignifyd.com ↗
Consider forEcommerce merchants that want approved orders backed by a financial guarantee against fraud chargebacks and prefer a fee tied to approved order value
Pricing notesPercentage of the order total on approved orders; no charge when an order is declined for fraud; rate set by quote (checked Sep 2026)
Feature to evaluateConfigurable financial guarantee that ranges from fraud-only cover to a total chargeback liability shift

Signifyd sells fraud protection to ecommerce merchants built around a financial guarantee. Its Guaranteed Fraud Protection product uses AI-driven decisioning at checkout to approve or decline each order, and approved orders are backed by a guarantee against fraud chargebacks. Signifyd says merchants are reimbursed for chargebacks on approved orders, which moves fraud loss from the merchant's books to the vendor's.

The detection layer draws on what Signifyd calls its commerce network. The product page cites more than 25,000 data features and describes custom, chained models trained for different ecommerce verticals. The pricing page adds that Signifyd collects session data such as IP address, behaviour and transaction data, and correlates it with forensic data and more than 150 out-of-band identity sources. Merchants can tune the risk threshold against target chargeback and approval rates, and the models learn from merchant feedback such as chargebacks and bank authorisation outcomes.

The pricing model is stated even though the rate is not. Signifyd charges a percentage of the order total when an order is approved, with no charge when an order is declined for fraud. The percentage depends on the products sold, the merchant's vertical, order volume and average ticket price. Exact pricing follows an assessment of current fraud operations, chargeback losses and order declines. The guarantee itself is configurable, ranging from fraud-only protection to a total chargeback liability shift.

Integration options are broad. Signifyd lists pre-built order integrations with Miva, BigCommerce, Adobe, Salesforce Commerce Cloud, Shopify, NetSuite, Accertify and VTEX, payment integrations with Adyen, Stripe, PayPal, Square and Worldpay, and REST APIs, webhooks, JavaScript tags and mobile SDKs for custom builds. The fit is an online retailer that wants predictable fraud cost per approved order rather than an in-house tuning operation.

Potential strengths

  • Pricing model is published, with no charge on orders declined for fraud
  • Pre-built integrations with major ecommerce and payment platforms

Trade-offs

  • The percentage rate is not published
  • Focused on ecommerce orders rather than bank payment rails
Sources and status

Riskified

enterpriseriskified.com ↗
Consider forEnterprise ecommerce merchants, including travel and digital goods sellers, that want guaranteed approval performance with chargeback cover and tools for policy abuse and disputes
Pricing notesQuote-based; Chargeback Guarantee charges only for approved orders (checked Sep 2026)
Feature to evaluateChargeback Guarantee that guarantees approval rates and covers chargebacks, with a separate product for refund, promo and reseller abuse

Riskified is an ecommerce fraud prevention company that describes protecting the shopping journey from login to checkout to refund claims and returns. Its homepage lists digital goods, retail, luxury fashion, travel and athletic and outdoor brands among the segments it serves, and includes customer testimonials from companies such as Lorna Jane, Rue Gilt Groupe, Gametime, Booking.com and Finish Line. The outcome figures in those testimonials are customer-reported.

The core product is Chargeback Guarantee. Riskified states that it guarantees approval rates and covers chargebacks on approved orders, and that merchants pay only for approved orders that generate revenue. Its machine learning models analyse hundreds of features per transaction and return approve or decline decisions in under a second. The vendor says each decision draws on more than a billion prior transactions from nearly a decade of guarantee decisions. Recover, included with Chargeback Guarantee, runs customer verification flows for borderline orders to reduce false declines, and a Control Center lets fraud teams track performance and analyse trends.

The rest of the suite extends past the checkout decision. Adaptive Checkout adjusts the shopping flow for each customer's risk profile. Policy Protect targets refund, promotion and reseller abuse. Dispute Resolve collects evidence and manages chargeback disputes. Account Secure addresses account takeover. Riskified states support for payment methods from ACH and open invoices to digital wallets, and integrations through its API, Magento, Stripe and Shopify.

No prices are published. The pricing link leads to a contact form, so buyers should expect a quote based on order volume and risk profile. The fit is a larger online merchant that wants the vendor to carry chargeback risk on approved orders and also has abuse problems beyond payment fraud. Banks and payment processors monitoring account transfers sit outside the product's stated scope.

Potential strengths

  • Fee applies only to approved orders, aligning cost with revenue
  • Suite covers checkout, account takeover, policy abuse and disputes

Trade-offs

  • No figures are published; pricing requires a sales conversation
  • Built for ecommerce orders rather than bank transfers
Sources and status

Forter

enterpriseforter.com ↗
Consider forLarge merchants that want one processor-agnostic decision layer for fraud, payment optimisation and AI shopping agents across the customer journey
Pricing notesQuote-based; pricing page is a contact-sales form (checked Sep 2026)
Feature to evaluateIdentity network the vendor sizes at more than 2 billion identities across 250,000 storefronts, applied to pre-purchase, checkout, account and post-purchase decisions

Forter positions itself as a decision platform for commerce, covering fraud management, payment optimisation and what it calls agentic orchestration. Its homepage describes a single decision layer across pre-purchase, checkout, account activity and post-purchase flows, and stresses that the product is payment and processor agnostic, so merchants are not tied to one acquirer or gateway.

The fraud management product rests on the Forter Network, which the vendor sizes at more than 2 billion identities across more than 250,000 storefronts. Forter says its AI analyses identity, behavioural, device and payment signals in real time to recognise returning legitimate customers and stop chargebacks before they occur. The same decisions apply across cards, wallets, buy now pay later, ACH, gift cards and alternative payment methods, which reduces the need for separate tools per payment type. For investigations, an Analytics Agent assembles transaction context and surfaces the signals that matter, and Forter Prism provides intelligence inside the merchant portal.

Two areas extend beyond classic fraud detection. Payment Optimization is presented as a way to raise authorisation rates and reduce costs by orchestrating payment flows. Agentic Orchestration addresses AI shopping agents: the vendor says it helps brands accept legitimate AI shoppers while blocking automated attacks across new commerce protocols. Buyers preparing for agent-initiated purchases may find this relevant; others can treat it as optional scope.

The homepage reports averages for chargeback reduction and false decline reduction, and customer quotes about higher approval rates. These are vendor-reported figures. Forter publishes no prices, and its pricing page is a contact-sales form. The fit is a large online merchant, marketplace or travel business with multiple payment providers and enough order volume to justify an enterprise decisioning contract. Banks screening account-to-account payments are not the audience described.

Potential strengths

  • Payment and processor agnostic
  • Covers cards, wallets, BNPL, ACH, gift cards and alternative payment methods from one platform

Trade-offs

  • No published pricing
  • Scope beyond fraud, such as payment orchestration, may exceed what a smaller merchant needs
Sources and status

Sardine

mid-marketsardine.ai ↗
Consider forFintechs, banks and merchants that need fraud scoring across cards and bank rails such as ACH, RTP and FedNow, alongside AML and identity checks in one platform
Pricing notesQuote-based; no pricing page is published (checked Sep 2026)
Feature to evaluateCovers both merchant card fraud and bank payment fraud, including ACH return prediction and pre-settlement screening of instant payments

Sardine describes itself as an agentic risk platform that unifies fraud prevention, AML compliance and real-time transaction monitoring for banks, merchants and fintechs. It is one of the few vendors on this page whose published material addresses both buyer groups directly, with separate product pages for merchant payment fraud and bank payment fraud.

For merchants, the payment fraud page describes pre-authorisation risk scores built from checkout behaviour, device risk, shipping address signals and cardholder verification. Rules can be created, modified and backtested in a no-code editor, and workflows can approve, step up, decline or route orders to a chargeback guarantee provider. An AI agent collects dispute evidence and submits it to the acquirer. Coverage extends to marketplace payments, gift cards and digital goods, and deposit and cashout risk in digital wallets and iGaming.

For banks and fintechs, the bank payment fraud page lists ACH, wires, SEPA, RTP, FedNow, Zelle and checks. Sardine says it evaluates transactions before funds move, can hold instant payments for review, and predicts ACH returns for unauthorised debits and insufficient funds by return code. It also covers altered or duplicate check deposits and fraudulent payouts or payroll disbursements.

The modelling layer is open. Sardine offers consortium-trained models, a feature store the vendor sizes at more than 12,000 risk features, and a Model Garden where teams can host their own models next to Sardine's. The wider platform adds KYC, KYB, document verification, sanctions screening and customer risk rating. No prices are published, so buyers should ask how cost scales when fraud, AML and identity products are combined. The fit is a fintech, sponsor bank or payments company that moves money across several rails and wants fraud and compliance teams working in one system.

Potential strengths

  • Spans card, ACH, wire, RTP, FedNow, Zelle and check fraud
  • Teams can bring their own models and run them alongside the vendor's

Trade-offs

  • No published pricing
  • The broad fraud, AML and identity scope may be more than a pure ecommerce merchant needs
Sources and status

Feedzai

enterprisefeedzai.com ↗
Consider forBanks and payment processors that need real-time transaction fraud detection across every payment channel, with behavioural profiling and optional AML on the same platform
Pricing notesQuote-based; no pricing page is published (checked Sep 2026)
Feature to evaluatePer-customer 360-degree risk profiles combined with a network-wide TrustScore drawn from Feedzai's customer base

Feedzai is an AI-native fraud and financial crime prevention platform that serves customers from global banks to emerging fintechs. Its homepage states that it secures around $9 trillion in payments each year and reports results from a tier 1 bank against that bank's previous solution, including more fraud detected and fewer false positives. These are vendor-reported figures. The site also cites analyst recognition, including a fraud prevention leader placement in the Chartis 2026 RiskTech Quadrant for fraud platforms.

The Transaction Fraud solution is the product closest to this category. Feedzai says it combines behavioural, non-monetary and monetary data to detect fraud across every payment channel. Its 360-View Customer Profiles build a risk profile for each customer from behaviour patterns, transaction history and cross-channel activity, an approach the vendor calls segment-of-one profiling. TrustScore adds network-wide intelligence from Feedzai's customer base, and the vendor states that clients detect four times more fraud with half the alerts compared with rules alone. Explainable AI, integrated case management and analyst tools are listed as part of the product.

Integration is designed for existing fraud estates. Feedzai says the platform ingests data from databases, transaction systems and third-party tools, can enrich its decision engine with custom rules or external scores, and supports importing and exporting machine learning models. Behavioural biometrics and device intelligence are offered alongside transaction monitoring, and a separate AML capability lets institutions run fraud and anti-money laundering on the same platform.

No prices are published, and buyers request a demo. The fit is a retail bank, card issuer or processor that needs real-time scoring across many channels and has the data and model governance to use a configurable platform. Ecommerce merchants looking for a checkout plugin will find the guarantee-based vendors on this page closer to their needs.

Potential strengths

  • Omnichannel coverage across cards, transfers and real-time rails
  • Supports importing and exporting machine learning models and third-party scores

Trade-offs

  • No published pricing
  • Built for financial institutions; a mid-sized online merchant is not the stated buyer
Sources and status

Featurespace

enterprisefeaturespace.com ↗
Consider forBanks, issuers, acquirers and processors that want adaptive behavioural analytics for transaction fraud and scams, deployed on-premises or as a hosted cloud service
Pricing notesQuote-based; no pricing page is published (checked Sep 2026)
Feature to evaluateAdaptive Behavioral Analytics that profile individual behaviour in real time, now part of Visa's Risk and Identity Solutions unit

Featurespace is a transaction monitoring company that builds AI tools for financial institutions to prevent fraud and financial crime. Visa announced on 19 December 2024 that it had completed its acquisition of Featurespace. The announcement said the business would join Visa's Risk and Identity Solutions unit and that Featurespace's product portfolio would be incorporated into Visa's existing offering over the following months. Buyers evaluating Featurespace should therefore ask how the product is packaged and sold today.

The Featurespace Platform, earlier marketed as ARIC Risk Hub, is built around Adaptive Behavioral Analytics and Automated Deep Behavioral Networks. The vendor describes these as machine learning techniques that profile each customer's actions, compare them with peer groups and analyse scam behaviour, adapting as behaviour changes. The platform is designed specifically for financial institutions. The homepage says it is live in large banks, payment processors, merchant acquirers, insurance companies and gaming organisations, and is deployed on-premises or as a fully hosted cloud service in more than 180 countries.

The solutions page adds a single integrated risk-scoring product for scams and account takeover, and a multi-tenancy capability that lets issuers and acquirers control the experience offered to their own customers. That is relevant to processors that run fraud detection on behalf of many client institutions. Featurespace publishes case studies with NatWest on scam detection and TSYS on fraud losses. The results in those studies are vendor-reported, and the volume figures quoted on the homepage and solutions page differ, so buyers should confirm current figures directly.

No prices are published. The fit is a bank, card issuer, acquirer or processor with in-house fraud strategy teams and a need for real-time behavioural scoring, particularly for authorised push payment scams. Online merchants are not the buyer described on the vendor's pages.

Potential strengths

  • On-premises or fully hosted cloud deployment
  • Multi-tenancy for issuers and acquirers serving their own clients

Trade-offs

  • No published pricing
  • Product roadmap is tied to integration into Visa's portfolio, which buyers should check in due diligence
Sources and status

NICE Actimize

enterpriseniceactimize.com ↗
Consider forBanks and credit unions that want enterprise fraud management across payments, scams, mule accounts and new accounts, with a packaged option for smaller institutions
Pricing notesQuote-based; no pricing is published (checked Sep 2026)
Feature to evaluateIFM covers payments fraud, scams and mule defence, new account fraud, authentication and investigations, and Xceed packages fraud and AML for community banks

NICE Actimize is the financial crime division of NICE and also appears on the StatWharf AML software page. This entry covers its fraud products. The Enterprise Fraud Management page presents IFM as an AI-driven fraud management platform that applies AI across detection, strategy, investigations and operations, together with data orchestration. The vendor describes intent-based AI, granular customer profiles and collective industry intelligence, with protection across all channels and payment types.

IFM is organised by use case. Scams and Mule Defense looks for suspicious activity patterns across the customer lifecycle, including money mule accounts. Payments Fraud provides real-time monitoring of payments. New Account Fraud targets onboarding. Investigations brings investigation functions and data into one platform, and Authentication Management helps institutions manage customer authentication across channels and set fraud strategy in real time. The resource library on the page covers check fraud, fast payments fraud, authorised push payment scams and the UK shift of reimbursement liability, which indicates the problems the product is built for.

Smaller institutions have a separate route. Xceed is described as real-time fraud detection and prevention for small and mid-sized banks, and the Xceed page presents Xceed AI FRAML as fraud prevention and AML compliance in a single platform for credit unions and community banks. It has three parts: Xceed AI Fraud for transaction monitoring across channels and payments, Xceed AI AML, and Xceed AI Investigations, which uses AI agents to triage and automate routine investigation work.

No prices are published, and both product pages lead to demo requests. The fit is a bank or credit union with an established fraud function, especially one consolidating fraud and AML operations. Online merchants and early-stage fintechs will find lighter, API-first options elsewhere on this page.

Potential strengths

  • Covers detection, investigations and authentication strategy on one platform
  • Separate Xceed product aimed at credit unions and community banks

Trade-offs

  • No published pricing
  • Enterprise deployments are heavier than the API-first tools on this page
Sources and status

Frequently asked questions

What is fraud detection software?

Fraud detection software scores transactions, orders or account events for fraud risk and returns a decision such as approve, review or decline, usually in real time. It combines machine learning models, rules and signals such as device, behaviour, identity and payment history. Ecommerce tools focus on card-not-present orders and chargebacks. Banking tools monitor card payments, transfers and instant payments for scams, account takeover and mule activity.

Is fraud detection software the same as fraud prevention software?

The terms are used interchangeably. Most vendors on this page, including SEON, Sift, Riskified and Forter, market their products as fraud prevention. In practice, detection is the scoring step and prevention is the action taken on the score, such as blocking a payment, requesting 3D Secure or holding funds. Buyers searching for fraud prevention software, fraud prevention platforms or transaction fraud detection will find the same products.

Which fraud detection tools suit ecommerce merchants and which suit banks?

Stripe Radar, SEON, Sift, Signifyd, Riskified and Forter focus on online merchants, marketplaces and digital businesses, where the main risks are stolen cards, account takeover and chargebacks. Feedzai, Featurespace and NICE Actimize are built for banks, issuers, acquirers and processors monitoring cards, transfers and real-time payments. Sardine publishes material for both groups, covering merchant card fraud and bank rails such as ACH, RTP and FedNow.

How much does fraud detection software cost?

Few vendors publish prices. Stripe Radar lists Standard, Plus and Pro subscriptions starting at $10, $14 and $20 a month for businesses, with pay-as-you-go alternatives, and includes Radar Lite on standard Stripe pricing. SEON Starter costs $699 a month for 2,500 fraud checks. Signifyd charges a percentage of approved order value. Riskified charges only for approved orders. The other vendors price by quote.

What is a chargeback guarantee?

A chargeback guarantee means the vendor reimburses the merchant for fraud chargebacks on orders it approved. Signifyd and Riskified both sell this model, and both tie their fee to approved orders. Signifyd says its guarantee can range from fraud-only cover to a total chargeback liability shift. Buyers should confirm which chargeback reason codes are covered, because friendly fraud and item-not-received claims may be treated differently.

How is fraud detection software different from AML or sanctions screening software?

Fraud detection protects a business and its customers from losses caused by stolen credentials, scams or fake accounts. AML software monitors for money laundering to meet regulatory obligations and supports suspicious activity reporting. Sanctions screening checks customers and payments against watchlists. SEON, Sardine, Feedzai and NICE Actimize sell both fraud and AML capability. See the AML software and sanctions screening software pages.

What data do fraud detection platforms use to score risk?

Vendors describe combining device intelligence, behavioural signals, identity data, payment details and transaction history, often enriched by a network of other customers. Sift cites more than 16,000 risk signals, Signifyd more than 25,000 data features and Sardine more than 12,000 risk features. Feedzai and Featurespace build a behavioural profile for each customer. Buyers should ask which signals require extra integration work, such as a device SDK.

How was this list compiled?

Candidates came from vendors named in AI answers to fraud detection queries and from vendor websites. Each vendor's product and pricing or documentation page was read on 19 September 2026, and prices come only from those pages. Kount was excluded because its domain now redirects to Equifax's identity and fraud services. No product was tested hands-on, and no vendor confirmed its entry. The order is not a ranking.

Suggest a vendor or correction

Send factual corrections to editorial@statwharf.com. Corrections are free. For inclusion or placement enquiries, contact partnerships.

Contact partnerships

First published September 2026. Page update dates reflect editorial changes, not a fresh check of every vendor.